13.1 sec in total
2.3 sec
10.6 sec
172 ms
Welcome to rfdf.ru homepage info - get ready to check Rfdf best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about rfdf.ru
Федерация флаинг диска России
Visit rfdf.ruWe analyzed Rfdf.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 10.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
rfdf.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value16.2 s
0/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.247
50/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
2279 ms
2069 ms
2189 ms
2070 ms
2060 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Rfdf.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfdf.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 586.5 kB (36%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rfdf.ru main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 968.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfdf needs image optimization as it can save up to 105.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 307.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfdf.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (62%)
58
22
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfdf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfdf.ru
2279 ms
modal.css
2069 ms
k2.css
2189 ms
attachments_hide.css
2070 ms
attachments_list.css
2060 ms
at-jp-styles.css
2067 ms
normalize.css
2061 ms
layout.css
2189 ms
joomla.css
2323 ms
system.css
2197 ms
template.css
2296 ms
menu.css
2188 ms
gk.stuff.css
2307 ms
style2.css
2315 ms
typography.style2.css
2427 ms
typography.iconset.style2.css
2327 ms
css
20 ms
css
39 ms
slideshow.css
2409 ms
mootools-core.js
2664 ms
core.js
2442 ms
mootools-more.js
2979 ms
modal.js
2456 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
k2.js
2524 ms
caption.js
2546 ms
attachments_refresh.js
2569 ms
gk.scripts.js
2587 ms
gk.menu.js
2638 ms
engine.mootools.js
2676 ms
engine.js
2698 ms
mootools-mobile.js
2717 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
2752 ms
roksprocket.js
2781 ms
moofx.js
2902 ms
features.js
5067 ms
slideshow.js
5040 ms
addthis_widget.js
229 ms
LogoWeb_PressRelease.jpg
229 ms
011555890efacd9191e8a420f16b052f_300_0.jpg
478 ms
2ae53f232f802cf2d463e2657a7f94e9_300_0.png
652 ms
7b74666d243c2b7fbdc217183be49069_300_0.jpg
487 ms
caab911bb4e0465491efd6576148e5ae_300_0.jpg
526 ms
b9f05b5298a58f2cf17c64e748d10d8c_300_0.jpg
511 ms
header_bg.png
343 ms
nsp_interface.png
459 ms
IMG_3065nsp_523.PNG
687 ms
photos.rk.press-release.ochm-pesok-2023-smallnsp_523.jpg
598 ms
2022-03-05-rfdfnsp_523.png
606 ms
LogoWeb_PressReleasensp_523.jpg
638 ms
beach_nationals2019_rfdfnsp_523.jpg
658 ms
EBUC2019_rosters1nsp_523.png
717 ms
jPiVcaafnhMnsp_523.jpg
726 ms
rusultimate_border.png
3122 ms
luckygrass.jpg
2996 ms
NEW_wfdf_logo.jpg
3126 ms
Aeroker_logo_black.jpg
2995 ms
dg45_pLmvrkcOkBnKsOzXyGWTBcmg-X6Vj_YIg.ttf
7 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBD5Xk.ttf
20 ms
social_icons_.png
2936 ms
watch.js
16 ms
tablet.css
116 ms
mobile.css
116 ms
rfdf.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rfdf.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rfdf.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfdf.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfdf.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfdf.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfdf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: