Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

31.3 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

29.3 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

rfgaoke.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rfgaoke content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfgaoke.com

Visit rfgaoke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rfgaoke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 29.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 30 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

rfgaoke.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rfgaoke.com

1504 ms

css.css

1672 ms

uaredirect.js

984 ms

jquery.min.js

3428 ms

work.js

998 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Rfgaoke.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Qiao.baidu.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Lxbjs.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfgaoke.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (58%)

Content Size

191.6 kB

After Optimization

79.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Rfgaoke.com main page is 191.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 97.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 21.3 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 9.8 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfgaoke needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

  • Original 97.3 kB
  • After minification 96.2 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 29.0 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfgaoke.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (50%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfgaoke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rfgaoke.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfgaoke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfgaoke.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfgaoke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: