31.3 sec in total
1.5 sec
29.3 sec
550 ms
Click here to check amazing Rfgaoke content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfgaoke.com
Visit rfgaoke.comWe analyzed Rfgaoke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 29.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 30 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
rfgaoke.com performance score
1504 ms
1672 ms
984 ms
3428 ms
998 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Rfgaoke.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Qiao.baidu.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Lxbjs.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfgaoke.com.
Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (58%)
191.6 kB
79.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfgaoke.com main page is 191.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 97.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfgaoke needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 62.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfgaoke.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (50%)
56
28
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfgaoke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfgaoke.com
1504 ms
css.css
1672 ms
uaredirect.js
984 ms
jquery.min.js
3428 ms
work.js
998 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
5412 ms
archefoucs.js
3835 ms
ercidianji.js
937 ms
bj.jpg
389 ms
zp_bj.jpg
20427 ms
n_li.jpg
877 ms
loading.jpg
4444 ms
1.jpg
20431 ms
2.jpg
20430 ms
3.jpg
20430 ms
4.jpg
18491 ms
main.jpg
11732 ms
gg.png
15372 ms
po_tit.jpg
15775 ms
po_li.jpg
16176 ms
con_tit.jpg
16596 ms
h_tit.jpg
17010 ms
1.JPG
20428 ms
2.JPG
20429 ms
3.JPG
20429 ms
4.JPG
20431 ms
5.JPG
20430 ms
6.JPG
20429 ms
7.JPG
20429 ms
8.JPG
20428 ms
9.JPG
20428 ms
10.JPG
20428 ms
11.JPG
20428 ms
12.JPG
20428 ms
13.JPG
20427 ms
14.JPG
20427 ms
15.JPG
20427 ms
foot.png
20427 ms
more.jpg
744 ms
1-140324151439451.JPG
20426 ms
1-140R60TKO24.jpg
20426 ms
1-140324151935952.jpg
5342 ms
1-140324152025441.JPG
20425 ms
1-140324151P1S9.JPG
20422 ms
1-140324151225595.JPG
20422 ms
1-140324151530L1.JPG
12100 ms
1-140324150Z9426.JPG
18480 ms
ab_tit.jpg
20120 ms
pr_tit.jpg
20119 ms
ne_tit.jpg
20120 ms
ne_li.jpg
20120 ms
f_bj.jpg
20119 ms
h.js
1440 ms
21.gif
717 ms
lxb.js
1586 ms
b.js
828 ms
hm.gif
903 ms
Rq2px0M
903 ms
bsl.js
1705 ms
www.sosoyun.cn
4087 ms
log.gif
421 ms
_l.js
935 ms
log.gif
379 ms
float.css
403 ms
Enter.php
843 ms
main_icon_invite_mess_api.js
1065 ms
main.css
904 ms
fix.css
714 ms
version.js
713 ms
invitebg.jpg
492 ms
m-webim-lite.css
369 ms
m-webim-lite.js
3380 ms
Refresh.php
280 ms
13.jpg
1089 ms
04.png
1088 ms
icon.png
732 ms
icon_close.png
732 ms
stat.gif
758 ms
btn-show-bg.png
551 ms
log.gif
311 ms
1.png
1703 ms
close.png
548 ms
log.gif
281 ms
3180 ms
Refresh.php
268 ms
button_111.gif
481 ms
button_111.gif
291 ms
Refresh.php
483 ms
rfgaoke.com SEO score
JA
N/A
GBK
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfgaoke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfgaoke.com main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rfgaoke.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfgaoke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: