5.4 sec in total
2.3 sec
3 sec
207 ms
Welcome to rfi.bg homepage info - get ready to check Rfi best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfi.bg
Visit rfi.bgWe analyzed Rfi.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rfi.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value2,770 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
2256 ms
150 ms
107 ms
392 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Rfi.bg, 35% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfi.bg.
Page size can be reduced by 643.9 kB (72%)
894.7 kB
250.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfi.bg main page is 894.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 514.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfi needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 205.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 425.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfi.bg needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 425.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)
17
13
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfi.bg
2256 ms
style.css
150 ms
zkVrsKQtRFw
107 ms
9HWvbxuVCYk
392 ms
pDVKTdPNYKk
107 ms
bcvkl3zEX_k
285 ms
likebox.php
111 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
6 ms
www-embed-player.js
28 ms
base.js
58 ms
VMo7O5e5aMO.css
340 ms
side.gif
406 ms
search.gif
554 ms
id
307 ms
2tj_Yt5eAEN1YazL-za5nq2m-sVEuK50_GPDTIKqlPM.js
325 ms
ad_status.js
325 ms
T8Ys39_ecZUP0z5o0qwgiftCx6c5Z_CDv350QIo51NY.js
198 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
222 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
223 ms
logo_ringo-vflOpz8ZI.png
221 ms
rfi.bg accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
rfi.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rfi.bg SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfi.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfi.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfi.bg
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: