Tools & Wizards About Us
rfjp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rfjp.com

RFJP G503 RFJP.com - MB GPW CJ2A CJ3A CJ3B M38 M38A1 jeep parts

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

rfjp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rfjp.com homepage info - get ready to check RFJP best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfjp.com

We have your Ford GPW and Willys MB Military Jeep parts here. All the parts you are looking for in your restoration project.

Visit rfjp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rfjp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rfjp.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.309

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rfjp.com

43 ms

rfjp.com

99 ms

default.aspx

485 ms

jquery.min.js

139 ms

bootstrap.min.js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Rfjp.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfjp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 159.2 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

885.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rfjp.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 660.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 30.2 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 660.2 kB
  • After minification 649.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RFJP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 99.1 kB

  • Original 293.3 kB
  • After minification 293.3 kB
  • After compression 194.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.1 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfjp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFJP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rfjp.com

rfjp.com

43 ms

rfjp.com

rfjp.com

99 ms

default.aspx

default.aspx

485 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

139 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

55 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

21 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

126 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

169 ms

shop.plugins.css

shop.plugins.css

33 ms

shop.style.css

shop.style.css

87 ms

settings.css

settings.css

124 ms

_bootstrap.css

_bootstrap.css

187 ms

base.css

base.css

126 ms

style.css

style.css

179 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

132 ms

formvalidate.js

formvalidate.js

180 ms

core.js

core.js

178 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

179 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

180 ms

css

css

33 ms

app.css

app.css

19 ms

shop.blocks.css

shop.blocks.css

12 ms

animate.css

animate.css

17 ms

header-v5.css

header-v5.css

12 ms

footer-v4.css

footer-v4.css

19 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

111 ms

jeep.jpg

jeep.jpg

52 ms

flipbook.jpg

flipbook.jpg

42 ms

M38.jpg

M38.jpg

30 ms

Dodge.jpg

Dodge.jpg

54 ms

timer.png

timer.png

43 ms

2039.jpg

2039.jpg

19 ms

75.jpg

75.jpg

40 ms

2218.jpg

2218.jpg

53 ms

133.jpg

133.jpg

54 ms

2706.jpg

2706.jpg

58 ms

1864.jpg

1864.jpg

61 ms

419.jpg

419.jpg

69 ms

2100.jpg

2100.jpg

58 ms

2709.jpg

2709.jpg

65 ms

2783.jpg

2783.jpg

66 ms

2725.jpg

2725.jpg

69 ms

1227.jpg

1227.jpg

69 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

84 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

85 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

92 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

91 ms

font

font

29 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

86 ms

Accessibility Review

rfjp.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rfjp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rfjp.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfjp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfjp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rfjp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RFJP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: