Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

rfldigital.com

Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system

Page Load Speed

7.8 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

714 ms

rfldigital.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rfldigital.com homepage info - get ready to check Rfldigital best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfldigital.com

Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system

Visit rfldigital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rfldigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rfldigital.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.rfldigital.com

2652 ms

analytics.js

30 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

98 ms

site.css

184 ms

collect

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rfldigital.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfldigital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 386.0 kB (43%)

Content Size

890.8 kB

After Optimization

504.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Rfldigital.com main page is 890.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 349.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 108.6 kB

  • Original 122.8 kB
  • After minification 105.2 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 349.0 kB
  • After minification 324.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rfldigital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 170.2 kB

  • Original 320.5 kB
  • After minification 318.2 kB
  • After compression 150.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 98.5 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfldigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfldigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

rfldigital.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfldigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfldigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfldigital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: