7.8 sec in total
2.7 sec
4.5 sec
714 ms
Welcome to rfldigital.com homepage info - get ready to check Rfldigital best content right away, or after learning these important things about rfldigital.com
Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system
Visit rfldigital.comWe analyzed Rfldigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rfldigital.com performance score
2652 ms
30 ms
98 ms
184 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rfldigital.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfldigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 386.0 kB (43%)
890.8 kB
504.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfldigital.com main page is 890.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 349.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rfldigital images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfldigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)
56
30
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfldigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rfldigital.com
2652 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
98 ms
site.css
184 ms
collect
32 ms
css
33 ms
style.css
177 ms
font-awesome.css
164 ms
magnific-popup.css
141 ms
jquery.js
259 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
253 ms
colormag-custom.js
215 ms
html5shiv.min.js
238 ms
adsbygoogle.js
23 ms
sitelogo1.png
202 ms
apple-watch-pulse.jpg
228 ms
slider-featured-image.png
185 ms
ca-pub-6605955833351076.js
169 ms
zrt_lookup.html
165 ms
show_ads_impl.js
81 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
122 ms
ads
332 ms
osd.js
16 ms
highlights-featured-image.png
48 ms
apple-maps-ios-81-392x272.jpg
164 ms
app-store-wwdc-2015-392x272.jpg
72 ms
ads
174 ms
4-Tips-for-Hiring-the-Right-Business-Assistant-130x90.jpg
67 ms
How-You%E2%80%99re-Doing-Branding-Wrong-And-What-To-Do-About-It-130x90.jpg
70 ms
4-Tasks-That-Will-Save-Your-Email-Marketing-Campaigns-130x90.jpg
66 ms
abg.js
33 ms
m_js_controller.js
41 ms
apple-maps-ios-81-130x90.jpg
121 ms
app-store-wwdc-2015-130x90.jpg
112 ms
favicon
131 ms
s
55 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
80 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
23 ms
x_button_blue2.png
22 ms
ads
343 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
728x90-animated.gif
376 ms
favicon
42 ms
a-KATRINA-386x217-130x90.jpg
58 ms
728x90.gif
234 ms
728x90-animated.gif
139 ms
ads
938 ms
site.js
57 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
65 ms
colormag-slider-setting.js
67 ms
navigation.js
72 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
62 ms
image-popup-setting.js
79 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
96 ms
fitvids-setting.js
97 ms
wp-embed.min.js
129 ms
sdk.js
792 ms
hostgator-0.01-banners-AN-300x250.gif
794 ms
logo.png
791 ms
infodelite-logo.png
790 ms
logo.png
788 ms
crispinfox_logo1.png
791 ms
ad-logo.png
791 ms
wpt5ss.woff
210 ms
rfldigital.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfldigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfldigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfldigital.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfldigital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: