Tools & Wizards About Us
rfq.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

rfq.de

Home | RFQ-Medizintechnik GmbH & Co. KG - Kaltlichtkabel, Containersysteme u.v.m.

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

263 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

rfq.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RFQ content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfq.de

70 Jahre Erfahrung in der Medizintechnik - das spricht für sich! RFQ bietet mehr als nur den Standard sondern punktet mit hervorragender Qualität und Fachwissen.

Visit rfq.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Rfq.de page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rfq.de performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rfq.de

263 ms

www.rfq.de

523 ms

willkommen

257 ms

madChickCss.php

108 ms

cEasyJs

333 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rfq.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfq.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.1 kB (66%)

Content Size

131.1 kB

After Optimization

45.0 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rfq.de main page is 131.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 94.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 85.7 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.9 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.7 kB or 90% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 400 B

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB
  • After compression 35.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfq.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (42%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rfq.de

rfq.de

263 ms

www.rfq.de

www.rfq.de

523 ms

willkommen

willkommen

257 ms

madChickCss.php

madChickCss.php

108 ms

cEasyJs

cEasyJs

333 ms

index.php

index.php

402 ms

8458ec9e9c858e4117afc335cf67428a.min.css

8458ec9e9c858e4117afc335cf67428a.min.css

187 ms

20f81ddc6e7569c60ba6d216a82bd6b3.min.css

20f81ddc6e7569c60ba6d216a82bd6b3.min.css

295 ms

cc3a3f9238ff48eab9fce03648401049.min.css

cc3a3f9238ff48eab9fce03648401049.min.css

300 ms

af025816f24592ee31ca5d72466615c3.min.css

af025816f24592ee31ca5d72466615c3.min.css

303 ms

9a82ed50adaed95dbc00b5ae057bd7be.min.css

9a82ed50adaed95dbc00b5ae057bd7be.min.css

416 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

270 ms

logo-transparent.svg

logo-transparent.svg

268 ms

saira-v4-latin-regular.woff

saira-v4-latin-regular.woff

244 ms

saira-v4-latin-500.woff

saira-v4-latin-500.woff

245 ms

saira-v4-latin-300.woff

saira-v4-latin-300.woff

243 ms

saira-v4-latin-200.woff

saira-v4-latin-200.woff

244 ms

saira-v4-latin-100.woff

saira-v4-latin-100.woff

287 ms

saira-v4-latin-600.woff

saira-v4-latin-600.woff

243 ms

saira-v4-latin-700.woff

saira-v4-latin-700.woff

274 ms

saira-v4-latin-800.woff

saira-v4-latin-800.woff

309 ms

saira-v4-latin-900.woff

saira-v4-latin-900.woff

308 ms

svgicon.woff

svgicon.woff

322 ms

linkedIn.svg

linkedIn.svg

304 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

352 ms

Accessibility Review

rfq.de accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rfq.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rfq.de SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfq.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rfq.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rfq.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RFQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: