1.6 sec in total
122 ms
1.3 sec
167 ms
Click here to check amazing Rfqdesk content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfqdesk.com
Visit rfqdesk.comWe analyzed Rfqdesk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rfqdesk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value1,550 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
122 ms
152 ms
69 ms
183 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rfqdesk.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Rfqdesk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 519.7 kB (15%)
3.5 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rfqdesk.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rfqdesk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 214.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfqdesk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (16%)
87
73
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfqdesk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfqdesk.com
122 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
152 ms
jquery.simple-scroll.js
69 ms
style.css
183 ms
global.js
171 ms
home.js
169 ms
home.css
59 ms
GetMarketSnapshot
12 ms
close_pop.png
99 ms
logo.jpg
77 ms
arrow.png
70 ms
us.png
63 ms
de.png
79 ms
sp.png
113 ms
ar.png
121 ms
it.png
77 ms
pg.png
112 ms
ch.png
109 ms
Fr.png
125 ms
Hb.png
109 ms
Rs.png
123 ms
search-box.jpg
202 ms
search-button.jpg
181 ms
b2b.jpg
238 ms
menu-l-h.jpg
148 ms
menu-r-h.jpg
182 ms
menu-l.jpg
163 ms
menu-r.jpg
183 ms
block.jpg
221 ms
close_pop.png
185 ms
slider_bg.png
198 ms
sl_img_01.png
261 ms
sl_img_02.png
300 ms
sl_img_03.png
354 ms
sl_img_04.png
464 ms
sl_img_05.png
404 ms
sl_img_06.png
406 ms
sl_img_07.png
375 ms
sl_img_08.png
466 ms
sl_img_09.png
573 ms
sl_img_10.png
485 ms
sl_img_11.png
511 ms
sl_img_12.png
609 ms
sl_img_13.png
665 ms
left_arrow.png
416 ms
img1.png
502 ms
img2.png
480 ms
img3.png
501 ms
img4.png
536 ms
img5.png
495 ms
img6.png
487 ms
img7.png
502 ms
right_arrow.png
509 ms
orange_button.png
493 ms
logo1.jpg
508 ms
logo2.jpg
522 ms
logo3.jpg
530 ms
logo4.jpg
500 ms
logo5.jpg
488 ms
logo6.jpg
501 ms
logo7.jpg
506 ms
logo8.jpg
558 ms
logo9.jpg
556 ms
logo10.jpg
539 ms
logo11.jpg
553 ms
logo12.jpg
481 ms
logo13.jpg
501 ms
logo14.jpg
474 ms
logo15.jpg
482 ms
logo16.jpg
449 ms
logo17.jpg
399 ms
logo18.jpg
441 ms
logo19.jpg
416 ms
logo20.jpg
325 ms
logo21.jpg
443 ms
logo22.jpg
343 ms
logo23.jpg
383 ms
logo24.jpg
326 ms
logo25.jpg
336 ms
left_form_bar.png
280 ms
lock_img.png
290 ms
search.png
318 ms
signin.png
311 ms
openRFQ.jpg
277 ms
graph.png
348 ms
white_arrow.png
312 ms
t.png
297 ms
f.png
331 ms
foot_line.png
309 ms
foot_logo.png
290 ms
rfqdesk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rfqdesk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rfqdesk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfqdesk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rfqdesk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfqdesk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfqdesk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: