7.5 sec in total
1.7 sec
5.6 sec
168 ms
Click here to check amazing Rfthr content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rfthr.com
国家新闻出版广电总局广播影视人才交流中心
Visit rfthr.comWe analyzed Rfthr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rfthr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.1
89/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
1742 ms
510 ms
763 ms
516 ms
776 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rfthr.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rfthr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 330.3 kB (33%)
1.0 MB
674.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfthr.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 949.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 286.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rfthr needs image optimization as it can save up to 286.2 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfthr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
67
67
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rfthr. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
rfthr.com
1742 ms
001.css
510 ms
index.css
763 ms
png.js
516 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
776 ms
js.js
523 ms
count.asp
2043 ms
bg.jpg
304 ms
close.gif
258 ms
2016021795317.jpg
804 ms
nav_03.jpg
279 ms
nav_05.jpg
285 ms
nav_07.jpg
771 ms
nav_09.jpg
538 ms
nav_11.jpg
544 ms
nav_13.jpg
811 ms
nav_15.jpg
788 ms
nav_17.jpg
799 ms
2016020311226.jpg
2036 ms
l_title.jpg
1293 ms
l1.jpg
1307 ms
lzhong.jpg
1061 ms
20121218161632.jpg
1356 ms
20121218155931.jpg
1324 ms
2012121816017.jpg
1558 ms
2012121816049.jpg
1563 ms
2012121816152.jpg
1600 ms
2012121816235.jpg
1612 ms
20121203152455.jpg
1812 ms
201212181651.jpg
1823 ms
2012121816335.jpg
1859 ms
20121203152752.jpg
1865 ms
20121203152837.jpg
2062 ms
2012121816646.jpg
2081 ms
201212181681.jpg
2117 ms
20121218161356.jpg
2123 ms
20121218161515.jpg
2485 ms
20121218161757.jpg
2296 ms
2012121816224.jpg
2318 ms
20121218162258.jpg
2336 ms
2012121816255.jpg
2407 ms
20121218162854.jpg
2408 ms
20121218162944.jpg
2318 ms
20121218163052.jpg
2308 ms
nav.png
2314 ms
search.jpg
2371 ms
index-c.jpg
2136 ms
index-d.jpg
2196 ms
list-xxzc.jpg
2068 ms
l_nrbg.jpg
2051 ms
index-g.jpg
2060 ms
index-j.jpg
2136 ms
index-a.png
2129 ms
y_X.jpg
1931 ms
kinavbg.jpg
1810 ms
1.gif
1112 ms
7.gif
1129 ms
8.gif
1202 ms
6.gif
1207 ms
0.gif
1249 ms
line_03.jpg
256 ms
line_05.jpg
267 ms
line_07.jpg
274 ms
line_09.jpg
278 ms
line_11.jpg
284 ms
line_13.jpg
289 ms
line_15.jpg
502 ms
line_17.jpg
517 ms
rfthr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
rfthr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
rfthr.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfthr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rfthr.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rfthr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rfthr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: