5.4 sec in total
694 ms
3.3 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to rgf.be homepage info - get ready to check RGF best content for Belgium right away, or after learning these important things about rgf.be
Actif depuis 2001, RGF est un organisme indépendant spécialisé dans le marché de l'épargne, de l'investissement, du crédit et de l'assurance.
Visit rgf.beWe analyzed Rgf.be page load time and found that the first response time was 694 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rgf.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value6.0 s
47/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
694 ms
66 ms
18 ms
40 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Rgf.be, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.schemaapp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rgf.be.
Page size can be reduced by 231.9 kB (9%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rgf.be main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RGF images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 69 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (48%)
92
48
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RGF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rgf.be
694 ms
www.rgf.be
66 ms
front.min.css
18 ms
style.min.css
40 ms
tribe-events-single-skeleton.min.css
34 ms
tribe-events-single-full.min.css
34 ms
widget-base.min.css
32 ms
style.css
504 ms
theme.min.css
37 ms
header-footer.min.css
44 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
498 ms
frontend.min.css
48 ms
swiper.min.css
586 ms
post-10356.css
52 ms
frontend.min.css
55 ms
post-8.css
66 ms
style.min.css
591 ms
front.min.js
71 ms
jquery.min.js
565 ms
script.min.js
588 ms
schemaFunctions.min.js
35 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
fontawesome.min.css
506 ms
solid.min.css
803 ms
js
67 ms
page-scroll-to-id.min.js
797 ms
happy-addons.min.js
933 ms
happy-addons-pro.js
934 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
935 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
936 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1107 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1084 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1272 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1191 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1209 ms
hooks.min.js
1216 ms
i18n.min.js
1387 ms
frontend.min.js
1450 ms
waypoints.min.js
1501 ms
core.min.js
1528 ms
frontend.min.js
1523 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1573 ms
gtm.js
133 ms
call.png
566 ms
pin.png
868 ms
facebook.svg
625 ms
linkedin.svg
637 ms
RGFgroupe-logo-1.jpg
675 ms
courtier-assurance.jpg
675 ms
Design-sans-titre-23.png
688 ms
Design-sans-titre-24.png
993 ms
Design-sans-titre-22.png
986 ms
Design-sans-titre-25.png
1018 ms
RGFinsurances-logo-150x150.jpg
704 ms
RGFlife-logo-150x150.jpg
714 ms
RGFbank-logo-150x150.jpg
727 ms
RGFloans-logo-150x150.jpg
737 ms
RGFadvice-logo-150x150.jpg
750 ms
KEREIS_LOGO_BASELINE_RVB_BLEU.jpg
1221 ms
financement-immobilier-credit-bullet.jpg
778 ms
signature.jpg
789 ms
inspiration.png
803 ms
objective.png
725 ms
skills.png
1117 ms
344963-namur-citadelle-de-namur.webp
788 ms
resto-9c2cb546c44bd8ba8bb45db53c0eb956933cdbdd-1.jpg
1123 ms
eicons.woff
870 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1291 ms
Montserrat-Bold-subset.woff2
766 ms
Montserrat-Regular-subset.woff2
681 ms
kvrv81.jpeg
678 ms
assurance-voyages.jpg
672 ms
financement-residence-secondaire.jpg
615 ms
bilan-patrimonial.jpg
510 ms
shutterstock_235514416-scaled-e1597757062322.jpg
500 ms
RGF-GROUP-ASSURANCES.png
910 ms
RGF-group-courtiers-en-assurance.png
457 ms
KEREIS_LOGO_RVB_BLANC.png
846 ms
logo-black-fr-1024x351.png
560 ms
CCI-logo.png
562 ms
absym-assurance.png
929 ms
athora.png
548 ms
vivium.png
563 ms
securex.png
569 ms
one-life.png
562 ms
nn-belgium.png
556 ms
lombard.png
551 ms
Ethias_logo.svg_-1200x770.png
554 ms
fidea.png
841 ms
europe-assistance.png
560 ms
dkv-e1593175339569.png
546 ms
baloise.png
545 ms
axa.png
542 ms
arag.png
549 ms
ame-life.png
520 ms
allianz.png
519 ms
ag-insurance.png
428 ms
aedes.png
442 ms
rgf.be accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rgf.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rgf.be SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgf.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rgf.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgf.be
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RGF. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: