Tools & Wizards About Us
rgh2.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

rgh2.com

RGH2 – Low-Carbon Hydrogen with CO2 Capture

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

192 ms

rgh2.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rgh2.com homepage info - get ready to check RGH2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about rgh2.com

Visit rgh2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rgh2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rgh2.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rgh2.com

2083 ms

rgh2.com

1734 ms

main.min.css

110 ms

pa-frontend-fcc8b9ea2.min.css

216 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rgh2.com, 27% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rgh2.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 358.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rgh2.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 120.7 kB

  • Original 144.1 kB
  • After minification 142.4 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 237.4 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RGH2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 61 B

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 101.3 kB
  • After compression 101.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 338 B

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 62.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgh2.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (82%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RGH2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rgh2.com

rgh2.com

2083 ms

rgh2.com

rgh2.com

1734 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

110 ms

pa-frontend-fcc8b9ea2.min.css

pa-frontend-fcc8b9ea2.min.css

216 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

317 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

329 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

329 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

324 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

317 ms

post-323.css

post-323.css

327 ms

global.css

global.css

424 ms

post-766.css

post-766.css

423 ms

css

css

80 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

542 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

431 ms

post-776.css

post-776.css

438 ms

css

css

95 ms

post-782.css

post-782.css

442 ms

post-791.css

post-791.css

531 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

539 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

535 ms

post-847.css

post-847.css

632 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

633 ms

submit.js

submit.js

640 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

644 ms

e-202437.js

e-202437.js

17 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

647 ms

iscroll.min.js

iscroll.min.js

649 ms

jquery-slimscroll.min.js

jquery-slimscroll.min.js

652 ms

premium-vscroll.min.js

premium-vscroll.min.js

659 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

746 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

754 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

754 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

757 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

761 ms

RGH2_LOGO_White_White-150x65.png

RGH2_LOGO_White_White-150x65.png

187 ms

RGH2_background-scaled.jpg

RGH2_background-scaled.jpg

688 ms

eo_4565-1-3.jpg

eo_4565-1-3.jpg

802 ms

Picture9.png

Picture9.png

902 ms

rodion-kutsaiev-pem_slmjt-w-unsplash-1-edited-scaled.jpg

rodion-kutsaiev-pem_slmjt-w-unsplash-1-edited-scaled.jpg

491 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

18 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

29 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

32 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

39 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

40 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

41 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf

40 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf

39 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

39 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf

43 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

44 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf

45 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf

44 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf

45 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

233 ms

Accessibility Review

rgh2.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rgh2.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rgh2.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgh2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Rgh2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rgh2.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RGH2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: