1.8 sec in total
72 ms
1.7 sec
65 ms
Welcome to rgo.cl homepage info - get ready to check Rgo best content right away, or after learning these important things about rgo.cl
Desde 1991 observando la necesidad de satisfacer la demanda a nuestros clientes, a través de la venta, arriendo y servicio de grúas horquillas
Visit rgo.clWe analyzed Rgo.cl page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rgo.cl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value44.2 s
0/100
25%
Value3.6 s
86/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
72 ms
41 ms
75 ms
850 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rgo.cl, 47% (22 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (850 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 279.1 kB (41%)
684.7 kB
405.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rgo.cl main page is 684.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 305.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 229.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 229.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rgo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (44%)
25
14
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rgo.cl
72 ms
minified.js
41 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
75 ms
polyfill.min.js
850 ms
thunderbolt-commons.a0e7929d.bundle.min.js
71 ms
main.b6f828b7.bundle.min.js
76 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
70 ms
lodash.min.js
74 ms
react.production.min.js
69 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
74 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
74 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
73 ms
ea9199_7a4e2c63240145a1b52bfccb99c7d0e5.png
374 ms
ea9199_a85c3038760245f7add3a1f49354aa1e.png
146 ms
ea9199_82a6b96eb2374e43bd4b4143fd033b46.png
396 ms
ea9199_9d4d54f36b5f4da2b3a3ba054f1a78cd.png
454 ms
ea9199_e5535fd486a844deb00db1fc418fc836.gif
234 ms
ea9199_8324dcd2473f405a8f9a466f62a79e02.jpg
499 ms
ea9199_2f1760bdee2e47d18ccac3a2687a00a4~mv2.jpeg
398 ms
ea9199_bb5c5e67eb464c5f864f8367387974e5~mv2.jpeg
498 ms
ea9199_7e22ee0f2a5e4befa8b647d7629ff988.png
613 ms
bundle.min.js
93 ms
e947b76a-edcf-4519-bc3d-c2da35865717.woff
15 ms
20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff
15 ms
94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff
15 ms
9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff
15 ms
ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff
14 ms
d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff
37 ms
120 ms
111 ms
113 ms
110 ms
110 ms
112 ms
156 ms
151 ms
151 ms
145 ms
146 ms
143 ms
deprecation-es.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
23 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
3 ms
right-arrow.svg
17 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
4 ms
rgo.cl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rgo.cl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rgo.cl SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgo.cl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rgo.cl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rgo.cl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rgo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: