Tools & Wizards About Us
rgtu.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

rgtu.net

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

230 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

265 ms

rgtu.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rgtu content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rgtu.net

Visit rgtu.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rgtu.net page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Rgtu.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

rgtu.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rgtu.net

230 ms

rgpv.ac.in

127 ms

www.rgpv.ac.in

173 ms

www.rgpv.ac.in

524 ms

style.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rgtu.net, 93% (113 requests) were made to Rgpv.ac.in and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) relates to the external source Rgpv.ac.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 398.0 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

791.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rgtu.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 653.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 107.3 kB

  • Original 121.6 kB
  • After minification 58.9 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 62.6 kB, which is 52% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 653.3 kB
  • After minification 639.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rgtu images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 228.9 kB

  • Original 357.6 kB
  • After minification 352.7 kB
  • After compression 128.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 228.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 56.8 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rgtu.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (54%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

46

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rgtu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rgtu.net

rgtu.net

230 ms

rgpv.ac.in

rgpv.ac.in

127 ms

www.rgpv.ac.in

www.rgpv.ac.in

173 ms

www.rgpv.ac.in

www.rgpv.ac.in

524 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

ClassCss.css

ClassCss.css

134 ms

Main.css

Main.css

138 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.css

175 ms

md5.js

md5.js

135 ms

Print.js

Print.js

149 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

165 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

274 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

232 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

348 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

218 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

329 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

263 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

270 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

274 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

397 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

313 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

318 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

324 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

377 ms

downlink.js

downlink.js

280 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

282 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.min.js

347 ms

ga.js

ga.js

96 ms

PositiveSSL_tl_white.png

PositiveSSL_tl_white.png

74 ms

slide16.jpg

slide16.jpg

269 ms

slide15.jpg

slide15.jpg

266 ms

slide14.jpg

slide14.jpg

306 ms

slide10.jpg

slide10.jpg

307 ms

slide9.jpg

slide9.jpg

303 ms

slide8.jpg

slide8.jpg

303 ms

slide7.jpg

slide7.jpg

304 ms

slide6.jpg

slide6.jpg

306 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

321 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

326 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

325 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

321 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

322 ms

BodyBG11.jpg

BodyBG11.jpg

337 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

386 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

386 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

390 ms

button_sap.jpg

button_sap.jpg

387 ms

about.jpg

about.jpg

389 ms

institution.jpg

institution.jpg

390 ms

departments.jpg

departments.jpg

436 ms

admission.jpg

admission.jpg

423 ms

academics.jpg

academics.jpg

390 ms

parants.jpg

parants.jpg

388 ms

stlife.jpg

stlife.jpg

385 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

facultystaff.jpg

facultystaff.jpg

350 ms

corner_left.jpg

corner_left.jpg

348 ms

box_left.jpg

box_left.jpg

345 ms

box_right.jpg

box_right.jpg

340 ms

chancellor.jpg

chancellor.jpg

342 ms

button_more.jpg

button_more.jpg

293 ms

boxbottom_left.jpg

boxbottom_left.jpg

322 ms

boxbottom_right.jpg

boxbottom_right.jpg

324 ms

wlcmmsg.jpg

wlcmmsg.jpg

320 ms

knowyourvc.jpg

knowyourvc.jpg

265 ms

press.png

press.png

264 ms

img_thesis.png

img_thesis.png

264 ms

box_left2.jpg

box_left2.jpg

233 ms

box_right2.jpg

box_right2.jpg

237 ms

arrows.gif

arrows.gif

236 ms

boxbottom_left2.jpg

boxbottom_left2.jpg

244 ms

boxbottom_right2.jpg

boxbottom_right2.jpg

244 ms

slide_rest.jpg

slide_rest.jpg

245 ms

small_bullet.png

small_bullet.png

248 ms

new_icon_blink.gif

new_icon_blink.gif

254 ms

verti_sap.jpg

verti_sap.jpg

252 ms

CaptchaImage.axd

CaptchaImage.axd

272 ms

Login.gif

Login.gif

271 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

138 ms

callus.jpg

callus.jpg

268 ms

IBMCOE.gif

IBMCOE.gif

224 ms

HelpSupport1.jpg

HelpSupport1.jpg

230 ms

support.gif

support.gif

228 ms

RYFT.gif

RYFT.gif

251 ms

black_aerow.gif

black_aerow.gif

252 ms

69_thumb.jpg

69_thumb.jpg

255 ms

corner_right.jpg

corner_right.jpg

188 ms

bottom_left.jpg

bottom_left.jpg

194 ms

bottom_right.jpg

bottom_right.jpg

193 ms

new.gif

new.gif

212 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

212 ms

shadow_left.jpg

shadow_left.jpg

211 ms

boxtop_bg.jpg

boxtop_bg.jpg

215 ms

boxleft_bg.jpg

boxleft_bg.jpg

219 ms

boxright_bg.jpg

boxright_bg.jpg

218 ms

boxbottom_bg.jpg

boxbottom_bg.jpg

241 ms

boxtop_bg2.jpg

boxtop_bg2.jpg

241 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

boxleft_bg2.jpg

boxleft_bg2.jpg

211 ms

gradient_bg.jpg

gradient_bg.jpg

216 ms

boxright_bg2.jpg

boxright_bg2.jpg

220 ms

boxbottom_bg2.jpg

boxbottom_bg2.jpg

218 ms

TextBoxBottom.gif

TextBoxBottom.gif

241 ms

dimond.gif

dimond.gif

239 ms

login_img.jpg

login_img.jpg

238 ms

shadow_right.jpg

shadow_right.jpg

247 ms

collect

collect

71 ms

bottom_center.jpg

bottom_center.jpg

247 ms

ui-bg_loop_25_000000_21x21.png

ui-bg_loop_25_000000_21x21.png

245 ms

ui-icons_cccccc_256x240.png

ui-icons_cccccc_256x240.png

265 ms

ui-bg_highlight-soft_44_444444_1x100.png

ui-bg_highlight-soft_44_444444_1x100.png

267 ms

ui-icons_ffffff_256x240.png

ui-icons_ffffff_256x240.png

266 ms

about_h.jpg

about_h.jpg

45 ms

departments_h.jpg

departments_h.jpg

53 ms

academics_h.jpg

academics_h.jpg

50 ms

admission_h.jpg

admission_h.jpg

52 ms

institutions_h.jpg

institutions_h.jpg

48 ms

stlife_h.jpg

stlife_h.jpg

49 ms

parents_h.jpg

parents_h.jpg

86 ms

facultystaff_h.jpg

facultystaff_h.jpg

93 ms

Accessibility Review

rgtu.net accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rgtu.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rgtu.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rgtu.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rgtu.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rgtu.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rgtu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: