Tools & Wizards About Us
rhemawebmarketing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rhemawebmarketing.com

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

406 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

784 ms

rhemawebmarketing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rhemawebmarketing.com now to see the best up-to-date Rhemawebmarketing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rhemawebmarketing.com

Rhema Marketing is a Digital Marketing Agency that helps small businesses get found online in Philadelphia, PA since 2009. Local SEO, SMM.

Visit rhemawebmarketing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhemawebmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhemawebmarketing.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rhemawebmarketing.com

406 ms

surecart-88a30dd5a5f8d0a52e6ab25589bd11d5.css

192 ms

style-5cc984eed9a34fa2d216a55b711f4d54.css

199 ms

style-865dd03dfebcdb4ae0742b566df198ef.css

197 ms

wp_head-97a6f5bb409925906d698961d1c730ca.css

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Rhemawebmarketing.com, 37% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Js.surecart.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (525 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhemawebmarketing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (35%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rhemawebmarketing.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 337.4 kB

  • Original 397.4 kB
  • After minification 389.5 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 337.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 691.5 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rhemawebmarketing needs image optimization as it can save up to 691.5 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 818 B
  • After minification 818 B
  • After compression 806 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (63%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhemawebmarketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rhemawebmarketing.com

rhemawebmarketing.com

406 ms

surecart-88a30dd5a5f8d0a52e6ab25589bd11d5.css

surecart-88a30dd5a5f8d0a52e6ab25589bd11d5.css

192 ms

style-5cc984eed9a34fa2d216a55b711f4d54.css

style-5cc984eed9a34fa2d216a55b711f4d54.css

199 ms

style-865dd03dfebcdb4ae0742b566df198ef.css

style-865dd03dfebcdb4ae0742b566df198ef.css

197 ms

wp_head-97a6f5bb409925906d698961d1c730ca.css

wp_head-97a6f5bb409925906d698961d1c730ca.css

139 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

196 ms

style-1025123768a7bb7bffabb9c003e63461.css

style-1025123768a7bb7bffabb9c003e63461.css

197 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

189 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

261 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

194 ms

style.min-310927a9888ebee1f5f612d2f5c62237.css

style.min-310927a9888ebee1f5f612d2f5c62237.css

194 ms

api.min-ffc490bdd40b1ce657c444b521473a43.js

api.min-ffc490bdd40b1ce657c444b521473a43.js

253 ms

et-core-unified-70.min.css

et-core-unified-70.min.css

252 ms

widget-ee5d6129bddcc7960769579c66b5d2f9.js

widget-ee5d6129bddcc7960769579c66b5d2f9.js

198 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

205 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

204 ms

style-eca2b6f6ab481ff3fcbbdad10ac4813d.css

style-eca2b6f6ab481ff3fcbbdad10ac4813d.css

345 ms

style-6e1898555975e95b042c4b3e933bd819.css

style-6e1898555975e95b042c4b3e933bd819.css

345 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

346 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

346 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

347 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

347 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

346 ms

static-loader-f95d7942a1f2d8dfb7c4a4a8983ae780.js

static-loader-f95d7942a1f2d8dfb7c4a4a8983ae780.js

347 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

347 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

475 ms

smoothscroll-e48958081febc3fcdc5450215f16070d.js

smoothscroll-e48958081febc3fcdc5450215f16070d.js

348 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

347 ms

jquery.fitvids-3bf88fd8d5356c7540a7e92c38a7047b.js

jquery.fitvids-3bf88fd8d5356c7540a7e92c38a7047b.js

410 ms

easypiechart-e11726c6c6a0caee929601ffc95d1c16.js

easypiechart-e11726c6c6a0caee929601ffc95d1c16.js

412 ms

salvattore-52775bfc1b41e336aa4553b7d135caa9.js

salvattore-52775bfc1b41e336aa4553b7d135caa9.js

412 ms

common-29dad6a5f5f1812c4b3acb975d2ea939.js

common-29dad6a5f5f1812c4b3acb975d2ea939.js

416 ms

wp_footer-92ffcec2a8ccf52c785acf9d5ed7a723.js

wp_footer-92ffcec2a8ccf52c785acf9d5ed7a723.js

415 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

472 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

525 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

471 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

473 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

411 ms

affiliates-5b512df0888a489a296ba728564a80c1b034895a.js

affiliates-5b512df0888a489a296ba728564a80c1b034895a.js

17 ms

divider3-1.png

divider3-1.png

382 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

30 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

39 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

38 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

41 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff

58 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

59 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

60 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

61 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

60 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

65 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

63 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

178 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEw.woff

66 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

65 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedA.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedA.woff

101 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

66 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEw.woff

103 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

103 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEw.woff

103 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEA.ttf

104 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tG.woff

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tG.woff

105 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tF.ttf

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tF.ttf

109 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEw.woff

108 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEA.ttf

108 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEw.woff

105 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEA.ttf

108 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEw.woff

109 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEA.ttf

111 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEw.woff

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEw.woff

109 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEA.ttf

110 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-224288-tb-224290-70-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-224288-tb-224290-70-late.css

174 ms

rhema-logo.png

rhema-logo.png

72 ms

dm-1.png

dm-1.png

324 ms

Teamwork1-01-01.png

Teamwork1-01-01.png

323 ms

Valentes.png

Valentes.png

195 ms

sherimane_johnson-1.jpg

sherimane_johnson-1.jpg

67 ms

wakila-saleem-2.jpg

wakila-saleem-2.jpg

67 ms

jennifer_johnson_rn_legal_nurse_consultant-scaled.jpg

jennifer_johnson_rn_legal_nurse_consultant-scaled.jpg

336 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

391 ms

smm.png

smm.png

198 ms

web-design-agency.png

web-design-agency.png

325 ms

sa.png

sa.png

395 ms

Business-Growth-e1482815283344.jpg

Business-Growth-e1482815283344.jpg

455 ms

CHATGPT-to-PPT-400x250.png

CHATGPT-to-PPT-400x250.png

519 ms

Google-Business-Profile-Chat-feature-400x250.webp

Google-Business-Profile-Chat-feature-400x250.webp

390 ms

web-marketing-400x250.jpg

web-marketing-400x250.jpg

402 ms

digital-marketing-questions-400x250.jpg

digital-marketing-questions-400x250.jpg

457 ms

restaurants-and-cafes-400x250.jpg

restaurants-and-cafes-400x250.jpg

457 ms

nap-consistency-400x250.jpg

nap-consistency-400x250.jpg

461 ms

rhema-logo.png

rhema-logo.png

468 ms

Accessibility Review

rhemawebmarketing.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rhemawebmarketing.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rhemawebmarketing.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhemawebmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rhemawebmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rhemawebmarketing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rhemawebmarketing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: