7.7 sec in total
736 ms
6.7 sec
267 ms
Click here to check amazing Rhine Pro content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rhinepro.com
RhiniePro
Visit rhinepro.comWe analyzed Rhinepro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 736 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rhinepro.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value23.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.331
34/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
736 ms
1230 ms
30 ms
968 ms
1207 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Rhinepro.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Rhinepro.com.
Page size can be reduced by 934.1 kB (9%)
10.2 MB
9.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rhinepro.com main page is 10.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 423.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhine Pro images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 305.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhinepro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 305.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (33%)
21
14
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhine Pro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rhinepro.com
736 ms
rhinepro.com
1230 ms
css
30 ms
styles-merged.css
968 ms
style.css
1207 ms
custom.css
735 ms
scripts.min.js
1959 ms
main.js
996 ms
custom.js
752 ms
fbevents.js
79 ms
gtm.js
119 ms
logo1.svg
248 ms
logo.svg
285 ms
sliderbg.jpg
1272 ms
sliderbg1.png
3351 ms
sliderbg2.png
3505 ms
home-sec-bg.png
967 ms
home-sec-bg1.jpg
2341 ms
home-sec-bg2.jpg
1494 ms
home-mob.svg
1210 ms
mob-home-bg.png
1524 ms
mob-home-bg1.jpg
2299 ms
mob-home-bg2.jpg
2246 ms
CSR94z5ZnPydRjlCCwlKa8cpYtF2vA.woff
29 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlCpOY6T_N9luYtEw.woff
70 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC0OI6T_N9luYtEw.woff
74 ms
CSR44z5ZnPydRjlCCwlC6OA6T_N9luYtEw.woff
74 ms
icomoon.ttf
1847 ms
rhinepro.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rhinepro.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rhinepro.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhinepro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhinepro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhinepro.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhine Pro. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: