Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rhinoshieldmo.net

Best Exterior Painting Contractors | Rhino Shield of Missouri

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

rhinoshieldmo.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rhinoshieldmo.net now to see the best up-to-date Rhino Shield Mo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rhinoshieldmo.net

The Best Exterior Painting Contractors for Rhino Shield in Missouri. Long-Lasting Paint Coatings for Home and Commercial Exteriors.

Visit rhinoshieldmo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rhinoshieldmo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rhinoshieldmo.net performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,050 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.753

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rhinoshieldmo.net

172 ms

www.rhinoshieldmo.com

520 ms

d7e78196c2866ba57faec2ba00a3e169.js

535 ms

stat.js

25 ms

autoptimize_55604c3516dbd2506da1f6f51f820fd4.php

240 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rhinoshieldmo.net, 75% (102 requests) were made to Rhinoshieldmo.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Rhinoshieldmo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (16%)

Content Size

13.1 MB

After Optimization

11.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Rhinoshieldmo.net main page is 13.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 312.5 kB

  • Original 377.7 kB
  • After minification 377.4 kB
  • After compression 65.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 312.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 12.2 MB
  • After minification 10.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rhino Shield Mo needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 223.4 kB

  • Original 452.6 kB
  • After minification 452.6 kB
  • After compression 229.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.4 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhinoshieldmo.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (45%)

Requests Now

121

After Optimization

67

The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhino Shield Mo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rhinoshieldmo.net accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

rhinoshieldmo.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rhinoshieldmo.net SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhinoshieldmo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhinoshieldmo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rhino Shield Mo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: