7 sec in total
411 ms
6.4 sec
269 ms
Visit rhodesian-ridgeback.at now to see the best up-to-date Rhodesian Ridgeback content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rhodesian-ridgeback.at
Visit rhodesian-ridgeback.atWe analyzed Rhodesian-ridgeback.at page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rhodesian-ridgeback.at performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value12.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value780 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
411 ms
2774 ms
26 ms
248 ms
702 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Rhodesian-ridgeback.at, 21% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rhodesian-ridgeback.at.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (67%)
2.2 MB
743.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rhodesian-ridgeback.at main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rhodesian Ridgeback images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 801.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 801.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 591.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhodesian-ridgeback.at needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 591.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (77%)
52
12
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhodesian Ridgeback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rhodesian-ridgeback.at
411 ms
www.rhodesian-ridgeback.at
2774 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
248 ms
style.css
702 ms
font-awesome.min.css
688 ms
style.min.css
641 ms
stylesheet.min.css
912 ms
style_dynamic.php
763 ms
responsive.min.css
502 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
628 ms
js_composer_front.css
882 ms
custom_css.php
764 ms
css
34 ms
eventon_styles.css
936 ms
font-awesome.css
941 ms
style.css
1009 ms
jquery.js
1133 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1128 ms
eventon_dynamic_styles.css
1162 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1055 ms
scripts.js
1185 ms
qode-like.min.js
1256 ms
plugins.js
1633 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
1500 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
1356 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1413 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1431 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1512 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1632 ms
default_dynamic.php
2381 ms
default.min.js
1684 ms
custom_js.php
2381 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1766 ms
js_composer_front.js
1871 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1889 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
1939 ms
eventon_script.js
2017 ms
eventon_gen_maps.js
2121 ms
js
49 ms
eventon_init_gmap.js
2127 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1950 ms
style.css
1261 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
JHA_logo_trans.png
694 ms
Logo_FeraGen_1_TRANSPARENT11.png
628 ms
logo2.png
626 ms
banner11.jpg
693 ms
border-bottom.png
623 ms
fci-logo1.png
625 ms
oekv-logo1.png
623 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
21 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
24 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
22 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
23 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
21 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
22 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
23 ms
evo_fontawesome-webfont.woff
549 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
IIm-lPOtfVKQy0GMiczF_6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
TVSB8ogXDKMcnAAJ5CqrUonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
collect
16 ms
image.jpg
456 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
245 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
246 ms
ajax-loader.gif
145 ms
rhodesian-ridgeback.at accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rhodesian-ridgeback.at best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rhodesian-ridgeback.at SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rhodesian-ridgeback.at can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rhodesian-ridgeback.at main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rhodesian-ridgeback.at
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rhodesian Ridgeback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: