Tools & Wizards About Us
ribit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ribit.com

ribit, A Digital Marketing Agency | Home |ribit.com | be interactive

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

485 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

85 ms

ribit.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ribit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ribit.com

ribit, a digital marketing agency, designs websites, eCommerce sites, does SEO, Social Media, marketing, advertising, and public relations.

Visit ribit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ribit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 485 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ribit.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ribit.com

485 ms

jquery.min.js

34 ms

53506.js

89 ms

4b130.css

176 ms

589 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Ribit.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) belongs to the original domain Ribit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.0 kB (12%)

Content Size

271.0 kB

After Optimization

239.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ribit.com main page is 271.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 183.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 32.1 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 25.7 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ribit needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 125 B

  • Original 183.5 kB
  • After minification 183.5 kB
  • After compression 183.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 467 B

  • Original 29.8 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 29.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ribit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (63%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ribit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ribit.com

www.ribit.com

485 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

53506.js

53506.js

89 ms

4b130.css

4b130.css

176 ms

589 ms

e538f.css

e538f.css

326 ms

e05c8.css

e05c8.css

258 ms

css

css

49 ms

fc06c.css

fc06c.css

273 ms

c6621.js

c6621.js

322 ms

all.js

all.js

31 ms

feefd.js

feefd.js

263 ms

2f697.js

2f697.js

339 ms

css

css

21 ms

css

css

26 ms

homepage-bg.png

homepage-bg.png

104 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

102 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

104 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

102 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

77 ms

page-bg.png

page-bg.png

102 ms

small-logo-white.png

small-logo-white.png

102 ms

all.js

all.js

51 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

98 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

91 ms

84 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

9 ms

js

js

87 ms

Accessibility Review

ribit.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ribit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ribit.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ribit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ribit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ribit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ribit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: