Tools & Wizards About Us
ricelake.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

ricelake.org

Home - Rice Lake Construction - A WRG Company

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

540 ms

ricelake.org screenshot

About Website

Visit ricelake.org now to see the best up-to-date Rice Lake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ricelake.org

Visit ricelake.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ricelake.org page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ricelake.org performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.071

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ricelake.org

50 ms

ricelake.org

1374 ms

copy-the-code.css

72 ms

copy-inline.css

72 ms

team-grid.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Ricelake.org, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ricelake.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (25%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ricelake.org main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 306.2 kB

  • Original 359.1 kB
  • After minification 355.2 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 306.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rice Lake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 565.4 kB

  • Original 754.4 kB
  • After minification 698.2 kB
  • After compression 189.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 565.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 230.5 kB

  • Original 260.8 kB
  • After minification 214.0 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ricelake.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rice Lake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ricelake.org

ricelake.org

50 ms

ricelake.org

ricelake.org

1374 ms

copy-the-code.css

copy-the-code.css

72 ms

copy-inline.css

copy-inline.css

72 ms

team-grid.css

team-grid.css

118 ms

fontawesome-team-grid.css

fontawesome-team-grid.css

121 ms

animate.css

animate.css

123 ms

nanoscroller.css

nanoscroller.css

99 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

78 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

52 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

52 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

52 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

56 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

67 ms

team-grid.js

team-grid.js

122 ms

jquery.animatecss.js

jquery.animatecss.js

76 ms

jquery.nanoscroller.js

jquery.nanoscroller.js

89 ms

css

css

34 ms

et-core-unified-17.min.css

et-core-unified-17.min.css

71 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

52 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

61 ms

copy-the-code.js

copy-the-code.js

61 ms

clipboard.js

clipboard.js

62 ms

copy-inline.js

copy-inline.js

65 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

109 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

107 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

107 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

107 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

108 ms

common.js

common.js

108 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

111 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

173 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

112 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

164 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-9-tb-122-17-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-9-tb-122-17-late.css

63 ms

RL_Header_logo.png

RL_Header_logo.png

68 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

69 ms

RL_web_HOME_v3.png

RL_web_HOME_v3.png

69 ms

RL_web_HOME_v2-09.jpg

RL_web_HOME_v2-09.jpg

119 ms

RL_web_HOME_v2-10.jpg

RL_web_HOME_v2-10.jpg

81 ms

RL_web_HOME_v2-11.jpg

RL_web_HOME_v2-11.jpg

117 ms

RL_web_HOME_v2-12.jpg

RL_web_HOME_v2-12.jpg

117 ms

waves-left.png

waves-left.png

70 ms

BW_background-images-01.jpg

BW_background-images-01.jpg

130 ms

RL_web_HOME_p7.jpg

RL_web_HOME_p7.jpg

177 ms

RL_web_HOME_p6.jpg

RL_web_HOME_p6.jpg

117 ms

hartford-sd-wastewater-facility.jpg

hartford-sd-wastewater-facility.jpg

131 ms

WadeLeonard_02_FullSize-1080x675.jpg

WadeLeonard_02_FullSize-1080x675.jpg

130 ms

Website-Announcement-Graphic_Web-Site-Announcement-1080x675.jpg

Website-Announcement-Graphic_Web-Site-Announcement-1080x675.jpg

131 ms

wrg.png

wrg.png

137 ms

rice-lake-culture-of-care.gif

rice-lake-culture-of-care.gif

177 ms

TradeGothicLTStd-Cn18.otf

TradeGothicLTStd-Cn18.otf

175 ms

TradeGothicLTStd.otf

TradeGothicLTStd.otf

106 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

106 ms

TradeGothicLTStd-Bd2.otf

TradeGothicLTStd-Bd2.otf

106 ms

Fremont-Bold.ttf

Fremont-Bold.ttf

107 ms

Accessibility Review

ricelake.org accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ricelake.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ricelake.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ricelake.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ricelake.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ricelake.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rice Lake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: