2.9 sec in total
363 ms
1.9 sec
633 ms
Welcome to richa.be homepage info - get ready to check Richa best content right away, or after learning these important things about richa.be
Visit richa.beWe analyzed Richa.be page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
richa.be performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.6 s
0/100
10%
Value22.6 s
0/100
25%
Value20.7 s
0/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
363 ms
107 ms
177 ms
169 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Richa.be, 82% (41 requests) were made to Richa.eu and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (835 ms) relates to the external source Richa.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 470.9 kB (20%)
2.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Richa.be main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 308.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richa.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 308.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (40%)
42
25
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richa.be
363 ms
en
107 ms
bootstrap.css
177 ms
style.css
169 ms
animate.css
162 ms
selectric.css
175 ms
red.css
176 ms
font-awesome.min.css
188 ms
jquery-2.1.1.min.js
322 ms
bootstrap.min.js
265 ms
browser_selector.js
265 ms
jquery.selectric.min.js
265 ms
jquery.icheck.js
265 ms
jquery.zoom.min.js
265 ms
script.js
365 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
12555881_615309118633661_1215650862_n.jpg
333 ms
12524325_843902389068723_6372362531867144121_n.jpg
70 ms
12800287_838470892945206_1859519979000923420_n.jpg
92 ms
12645216_741310922671087_4206884199358921513_n.jpg
169 ms
12507671_813335995458696_4470676888117882902_n.jpg
110 ms
927219_527182184113468_1090259283_n.jpg
449 ms
logo.svg
151 ms
background-slider2.jpg
536 ms
background-slider2-mobile.jpg
329 ms
background-slider.jpg
501 ms
background-slider-mobile.png
343 ms
rectangle-6.png
285 ms
rectangle-6-copy.png
290 ms
shadow.png
363 ms
background.png
453 ms
background-touch.png
574 ms
rectangle-86-copy.png
421 ms
backgrund-picture.png
835 ms
backgrund-picture-mobile.png
500 ms
shape.png
534 ms
imported-layers-4.png
584 ms
imported-layers-4@2x.png
580 ms
background-image.png
778 ms
background-image-mobile.png
616 ms
imported-layers.png
654 ms
imported-layers@2x.png
657 ms
Belgium-Flag-icon.png
667 ms
GeomanistBook.woff
697 ms
collect
15 ms
GeomanistRegular.woff
700 ms
GeomanistMedium.woff
692 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
718 ms
GeomanistBold.woff
735 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
771 ms
richa.be accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
richa.be best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
richa.be SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richa.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richa.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richa.be
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: