2.6 sec in total
194 ms
2.2 sec
167 ms
Click here to check amazing Richardgreenweb Design content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk
Would you like a website that gets results and provides a good Return On Investment, but will look great on all devices and be environmentally friendly?
Visit richardgreenwebdesign.co.ukWe analyzed Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.306
38/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
194 ms
749 ms
154 ms
233 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (749 ms) belongs to the original domain Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 66.3 kB (18%)
368.4 kB
302.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk main page is 368.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 167.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 445 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardgreenweb Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (83%)
48
8
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardgreenweb Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk
194 ms
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk
749 ms
reset.css
154 ms
style.css
233 ms
538c625923a63.css
232 ms
structure.css
243 ms
magnific-popup.css
169 ms
go_portfolio_styles.css
170 ms
css
31 ms
ninja-contact-form.css
229 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.css
276 ms
js_composer.min.css
321 ms
Defaults.css
276 ms
ultimate.min.css
415 ms
jquery.js
341 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
305 ms
ninja-contact-form.min.js
335 ms
jquery.cookie.js
336 ms
tpbr_front.min.js
382 ms
core.min.js
397 ms
ultimate.min.js
479 ms
wide-rounded.css
408 ms
intense_a1e005e4abba0da339f3430a97322cdce541972f.css
450 ms
jquery.fitvids-max-width-modification.js
457 ms
init-fitvids.js
474 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
553 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
553 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-packed.js
553 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
553 ms
go_portfolio_scripts.js
554 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
568 ms
custom_jquery_additions.js
567 ms
wp-embed.min.js
572 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
608 ms
modernizr.min.js
638 ms
intense.icon.min.js
696 ms
intense.contentbox.min.js
713 ms
intense.animated.min.js
715 ms
css
18 ms
css
22 ms
css
81 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
450 ms
close.png
223 ms
closeblack.png
259 ms
pixel.png
257 ms
35.png
258 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
58 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
142 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
142 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
142 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
142 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
143 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
143 ms
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk
493 ms
ncf_icons.svg
78 ms
ncf_icons.woff
79 ms
style-responsive.css
79 ms
style-mobile.css
83 ms
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardgreenwebdesign.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richardgreenweb Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: