Tools & Wizards About Us
richardmille.to screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

richardmille.to

Richard Mille Replica | Fake Watches 1:1 Super Clone Vs Real Original Knockoff

Page Load Speed

10.1 sec in total

First Response

731 ms

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

921 ms

richardmille.to screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richard Mille content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardmille.to

Fake Richard Mille Replica Watches, Which is the highest replica version on the market, Free shipping worldwide.

Visit richardmille.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardmille.to page load time and found that the first response time was 731 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardmille.to performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.richardmille.to

731 ms

style-index.css

478 ms

classic-themes.min.css

113 ms

styles.css

474 ms

free-shipping.css

462 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Richardmille.to and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardmille.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 300.8 kB (78%)

Content Size

384.1 kB

After Optimization

83.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardmille.to main page is 384.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 331.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 290.2 kB

  • Original 331.7 kB
  • After minification 321.5 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 290.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 399 B

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 44.8 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardmille.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (14%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

50

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richard Mille. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.richardmille.to

www.richardmille.to

731 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

478 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

113 ms

styles.css

styles.css

474 ms

free-shipping.css

free-shipping.css

462 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

52 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

504 ms

style.css

style.css

570 ms

readMoreStyles.css

readMoreStyles.css

17 ms

animate.css

animate.css

49 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

74 ms

chunk.countup.js

chunk.countup.js

473 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

503 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWCWtFCfQ7A.woff

455 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

675 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw3q5d0N7w.woff

473 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

473 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

891 ms

webp_30-521x800.webp

webp_30-521x800.webp

1021 ms

webp_44-521x800.webp

webp_44-521x800.webp

1115 ms

webp_43-521x800.webp

webp_43-521x800.webp

515 ms

webp_42-521x800.webp

webp_42-521x800.webp

916 ms

webp_41-521x800.webp

webp_41-521x800.webp

1068 ms

webp_40-521x800.webp

webp_40-521x800.webp

1331 ms

webp_39-521x800.webp

webp_39-521x800.webp

1551 ms

webp_38-521x800.webp

webp_38-521x800.webp

1594 ms

webp_37-521x800.webp

webp_37-521x800.webp

1669 ms

webp_36-521x800.webp

webp_36-521x800.webp

1774 ms

webp_35-521x800.webp

webp_35-521x800.webp

1801 ms

webp_34-521x800.webp

webp_34-521x800.webp

1776 ms

webp_33-521x800.webp

webp_33-521x800.webp

2331 ms

webp_45-521x800.webp

webp_45-521x800.webp

2060 ms

webp_32-521x800.webp

webp_32-521x800.webp

2344 ms

webp_15-521x800.webp

webp_15-521x800.webp

1785 ms

webp_31-521x800.webp

webp_31-521x800.webp

2218 ms

webp_29-521x800.webp

webp_29-521x800.webp

2481 ms

webp_28-521x800.webp

webp_28-521x800.webp

2459 ms

webp_14-521x800.webp

webp_14-521x800.webp

2739 ms

webp_13-521x800.webp

webp_13-521x800.webp

2879 ms

webp_27-521x800.webp

webp_27-521x800.webp

2888 ms

webp_26-521x800.webp

webp_26-521x800.webp

3023 ms

webp_25-521x800.webp

webp_25-521x800.webp

3159 ms

webp_12-521x800.webp

webp_12-521x800.webp

2823 ms

webp_11-521x800.webp

webp_11-521x800.webp

3405 ms

webp_10-521x800.webp

webp_10-521x800.webp

3499 ms

webp_9-521x800.webp

webp_9-521x800.webp

3329 ms

webp_8-521x800.webp

webp_8-521x800.webp

3538 ms

webp_7-521x800.webp

webp_7-521x800.webp

3219 ms

webp_6-521x800.webp

webp_6-521x800.webp

3413 ms

webp_5-521x800.webp

webp_5-521x800.webp

3587 ms

webp_24-521x800.webp

webp_24-521x800.webp

3602 ms

webp_23-521x800.webp

webp_23-521x800.webp

3691 ms

webp_4-521x800.webp

webp_4-521x800.webp

3700 ms

webp_3-521x800.webp

webp_3-521x800.webp

3707 ms

webp_22-521x800.webp

webp_22-521x800.webp

3707 ms

webp_2-521x800.webp

webp_2-521x800.webp

3799 ms

webp_21-521x800.webp

webp_21-521x800.webp

3523 ms

webp_1-1-521x800.webp

webp_1-1-521x800.webp

3828 ms

webp_0-1-521x800.webp

webp_0-1-521x800.webp

3807 ms

webp_20-521x800.webp

webp_20-521x800.webp

3752 ms

webp_19-521x800.webp

webp_19-521x800.webp

3645 ms

webp_17-521x800.webp

webp_17-521x800.webp

3695 ms

webp_16-521x800.webp

webp_16-521x800.webp

3610 ms

webp_18-521x800.webp

webp_18-521x800.webp

3696 ms

Accessibility Review

richardmille.to accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

richardmille.to best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

richardmille.to SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardmille.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardmille.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardmille.to

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richard Mille. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: