4.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.5 sec
155 ms
Visit richardrosenman.com now to see the best up-to-date Richardrosenman content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardrosenman.com
Cutting-edge, professional Photoshop plugins, After Effects plugins and Stock Footage for 3D artists, designers and photographers.
Visit richardrosenman.comWe analyzed Richardrosenman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
richardrosenman.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
1249 ms
57 ms
167 ms
101 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Richardrosenman.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Richardrosenman.com.
Page size can be reduced by 481.1 kB (55%)
874.2 kB
393.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardrosenman.com main page is 874.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 369.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardrosenman images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 321.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardrosenman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 321.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)
34
12
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardrosenman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardrosenman.com
1249 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
57 ms
style.min.css
167 ms
styles.css
101 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
132 ms
woocommerce.css
242 ms
style.css
261 ms
jquery.min.js
207 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
js
62 ms
718ad4d2e7.js
51 ms
index.js
175 ms
index.js
205 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
207 ms
js.cookie.min.js
212 ms
woocommerce.min.js
246 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
251 ms
main.min.js
249 ms
api.js
42 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
254 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
358 ms
index.js
358 ms
scanlines.gif
54 ms
logo.gif
56 ms
dofpro_ae_banner.jpg
179 ms
software_ultraflares_cover-380x214.jpg
103 ms
software_dofpro_logo-380x214.jpg
103 ms
software_dofpro_ae_logo-380x214.jpg
54 ms
software_lumiere_cover-380x214.jpg
75 ms
software_mblpro_cover-380x214.jpg
54 ms
software_lattice_image01-380x214.jpg
93 ms
js
51 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
collect
45 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
58 ms
richardrosenman.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
richardrosenman.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
richardrosenman.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardrosenman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardrosenman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardrosenman.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardrosenman. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: