Tools & Wizards About Us
richardson-poolservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

richardson-poolservice.com

Top Richardson Pool Service - Extraordinary Professional Pool Maintenance

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

536 ms

richardson-poolservice.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to richardson-poolservice.com homepage info - get ready to check Richardson Pool Service best content right away, or after learning these important things about richardson-poolservice.com

Secure your pool with our remarkable expert top Richardson pool service and find the conceivable outcomes a professionally kept up pool can offer in Richardson.

Visit richardson-poolservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardson-poolservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardson-poolservice.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

72/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richardson-poolservice.com

108 ms

www.richardson-poolservice.com

518 ms

gtm.js

47 ms

400px-Richardson_August_2019_01_%28plaza%29.jpg

137 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Richardson-poolservice.com, 26% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) belongs to the original domain Richardson-poolservice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 279.7 kB (42%)

Content Size

671.7 kB

After Optimization

392.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Richardson-poolservice.com main page is 671.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 305.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 258.2 kB

  • Original 305.9 kB
  • After minification 300.3 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 258.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 290.4 kB
  • After minification 271.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardson Pool Service images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 75.2 kB
  • After compression 72.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardson Pool Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richardson-poolservice.com

richardson-poolservice.com

108 ms

www.richardson-poolservice.com

www.richardson-poolservice.com

518 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

47 ms

400px-Richardson_August_2019_01_%28plaza%29.jpg

400px-Richardson_August_2019_01_%28plaza%29.jpg

137 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

43 ms

wow.js

wow.js

79 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

106 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

112 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

110 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

113 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

118 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

144 ms

maskedinput.min.js

maskedinput.min.js

142 ms

custom.js

custom.js

261 ms

5-stars.png

5-stars.png

150 ms

kids-enjoying-clean-pool-texas.jpg

kids-enjoying-clean-pool-texas.jpg

275 ms

headingbg.png

headingbg.png

275 ms

Pool-Service-Plan-Comparison.png

Pool-Service-Plan-Comparison.png

354 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

274 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

274 ms

logo3.png

logo3.png

354 ms

logo4.png

logo4.png

327 ms

lic1017.png

lic1017.png

352 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

351 ms

houz.png

houz.png

348 ms

zillow.png

zillow.png

368 ms

tumbler.png

tumbler.png

373 ms

JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wlhzg.ttf

JTUSjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wlhzg.ttf

21 ms

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_cJD3gnD-w.ttf

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_cJD3gnD-w.ttf

40 ms

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_bZF3gnD-w.ttf

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_bZF3gnD-w.ttf

55 ms

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_dJE3gnD-w.ttf

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_dJE3gnD-w.ttf

59 ms

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_c5H3gnD-w.ttf

JTURjIg1_i6t8kCHKm45_c5H3gnD-w.ttf

58 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

156 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhs.ttf

57 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhs.ttf

57 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN8rsOUuhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN8rsOUuhs.ttf

57 ms

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0e.ttf

81 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OUuhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OUuhs.ttf

80 ms

Accessibility Review

richardson-poolservice.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

richardson-poolservice.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

richardson-poolservice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardson-poolservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardson-poolservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardson-poolservice.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardson Pool Service. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: