Tools & Wizards About Us
richardsonandstarling.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

richardsonandstarling.co.uk

Dry Rot, Woodworm & Damp Proofing Specialists - Richardson & Starling

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

397 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

richardsonandstarling.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richardson And Starling content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richardsonandstarling.co.uk

Richardson & Starling - Specialists in Treating Dry Rot, Woodworm, Penetrating & Rising Damp. 30 Year Guarantees. Award-winning Damp Proofing Company.

Visit richardsonandstarling.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardsonandstarling.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardsonandstarling.co.uk performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.richardsonandstarling.co.uk

397 ms

bootstrap.css

38 ms

style.css

61 ms

bcv3itw.css

93 ms

fontawesome.min.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Richardsonandstarling.co.uk, 8% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (484 ms) belongs to the original domain Richardsonandstarling.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 360.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardsonandstarling.co.uk main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 113.0 kB

  • Original 135.7 kB
  • After minification 123.0 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 247.8 kB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardson And Starling images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 113.4 kB
  • After minification 113.4 kB
  • After compression 113.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardson And Starling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.richardsonandstarling.co.uk

www.richardsonandstarling.co.uk

397 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

61 ms

bcv3itw.css

bcv3itw.css

93 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

78 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

55 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

48 ms

chat-style.css

chat-style.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

81 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

80 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

101 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

90 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

99 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

98 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

107 ms

animejs.js

animejs.js

228 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

226 ms

main.js

main.js

226 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

227 ms

the-grid.min.js

the-grid.min.js

240 ms

klaro.js

klaro.js

236 ms

fancybox.js

fancybox.js

239 ms

js

js

90 ms

svgxuse.js

svgxuse.js

239 ms

chat-script.js

chat-script.js

242 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

239 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

371 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

371 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

372 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

369 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

413 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

369 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

476 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

479 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

473 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

484 ms

p.css

p.css

22 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

333 ms

Richardson-and-Starling-Rev@2x.png

Richardson-and-Starling-Rev@2x.png

255 ms

RS-Thumbnail-300x168.png

RS-Thumbnail-300x168.png

254 ms

play.svg

play.svg

270 ms

star.png

star.png

267 ms

Dry-Rot-2-700x700.jpg

Dry-Rot-2-700x700.jpg

269 ms

Wet-Rot-scaled-e1696410708297-700x700.jpg

Wet-Rot-scaled-e1696410708297-700x700.jpg

266 ms

Condenstation-Treatment-scaled-e1696410788106-700x700.jpg

Condenstation-Treatment-scaled-e1696410788106-700x700.jpg

268 ms

rising-damp-wall-700x700.jpg

rising-damp-wall-700x700.jpg

336 ms

Woodworm-scaled-e1696410905213-700x700.jpg

Woodworm-scaled-e1696410905213-700x700.jpg

339 ms

Historic-building-repair-hero-image-700x700.jpg

Historic-building-repair-hero-image-700x700.jpg

337 ms

Penetrating-Damp-Treatment-in-Kirkintilloch-Case-Study-Image-1.jpg

Penetrating-Damp-Treatment-in-Kirkintilloch-Case-Study-Image-1.jpg

340 ms

Home-Hero-700x700.jpg

Home-Hero-700x700.jpg

342 ms

richardson-and-starling-branches.png

richardson-and-starling-branches.png

341 ms

richardson-and-starling-surveyors.png

richardson-and-starling-surveyors.png

343 ms

richardson-and-starling-guarantee.png

richardson-and-starling-guarantee.png

343 ms

richardson-and-starling-association-awards.png

richardson-and-starling-association-awards.png

343 ms

d

d

147 ms

d

d

232 ms

d

d

234 ms

20240409_093201-scaled-e1723464945993-1024x943.jpg

20240409_093201-scaled-e1723464945993-1024x943.jpg

343 ms

concret-lintel-repaic-cs-image-4.jpg

concret-lintel-repaic-cs-image-4.jpg

343 ms

Rotten-external-timber-image-2.jpg

Rotten-external-timber-image-2.jpg

336 ms

WhyChoose-Richardson-Starling-1024x570.png

WhyChoose-Richardson-Starling-1024x570.png

345 ms

Damp-1024x575.png

Damp-1024x575.png

338 ms

How-To-Accept-1024x568.png

How-To-Accept-1024x568.png

333 ms

What-happens-next-1024x570.png

What-happens-next-1024x570.png

336 ms

What-to-expect-1024x571.png

What-to-expect-1024x571.png

334 ms

Aftercare-1024x569.png

Aftercare-1024x569.png

339 ms

icon-chevron-right.png

icon-chevron-right.png

216 ms

d

d

89 ms

d

d

91 ms

d

d

91 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

214 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

326 ms

icon-chevron-left.png

icon-chevron-left.png

212 ms

Mackley-constructionline@2x.png

Mackley-constructionline@2x.png

184 ms

bw-Best-Practice-Awards-2020_Winners@2x-300x101.png

bw-Best-Practice-Awards-2020_Winners@2x-300x101.png

212 ms

trustmark-logo-rgb@2x-300x83.png

trustmark-logo-rgb@2x-300x83.png

173 ms

logobwa@2x-300x114.png

logobwa@2x-300x114.png

153 ms

PCA-Logo-300x150.png

PCA-Logo-300x150.png

154 ms

iso-14001-300x300.png

iso-14001-300x300.png

150 ms

iso-9001-300x300.png

iso-9001-300x300.png

149 ms

iso-45001-300x300.png

iso-45001-300x300.png

147 ms

book-a-survey.png

book-a-survey.png

156 ms

bot.png

bot.png

151 ms

icon-close.png

icon-close.png

171 ms

select.svg

select.svg

181 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

31 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

29 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

20 ms

Accessibility Review

richardsonandstarling.co.uk accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

richardsonandstarling.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

richardsonandstarling.co.uk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsonandstarling.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardsonandstarling.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardsonandstarling.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardson And Starling. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: