Tools & Wizards About Us
richardsoneye.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

richardsoneye.com

First Sight Family Vision | Optometry in Battle Ground, WA

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

590 ms

richardsoneye.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to richardsoneye.com homepage info - get ready to check Richardsoneye best content right away, or after learning these important things about richardsoneye.com

Welcome to First Sight Family Vision! We’re proud to offer comprehensive eye care services and eyewear for the whole family.

Visit richardsoneye.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardsoneye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardsoneye.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richardsoneye.com

45 ms

www.firstsightfamilyvision.com

3399 ms

font-awesome.min.css

215 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

227 ms

style.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Richardsoneye.com, 48% (28 requests) were made to Firstsightfamilyvision.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Firstsightfamilyvision.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardsoneye.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 49.0 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 56.6 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richardsoneye images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 323.4 kB
  • After minification 323.4 kB
  • After compression 288.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 111.2 kB
  • After minification 111.2 kB
  • After compression 109.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardsoneye.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardsoneye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richardsoneye.com

richardsoneye.com

45 ms

www.firstsightfamilyvision.com

www.firstsightfamilyvision.com

3399 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

215 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

227 ms

style.css

style.css

162 ms

cff-style.css

cff-style.css

225 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

35 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

287 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

301 ms

01ed1f9c84.js

01ed1f9c84.js

208 ms

et-divi-customizer-global-1708705958271.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global-1708705958271.min.css

304 ms

inline.js

inline.js

42 ms

js

js

59 ms

js

js

100 ms

jquery.matchHeight.js

jquery.matchHeight.js

279 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

11 ms

custom.js

custom.js

296 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

582 ms

cff-scripts.js

cff-scripts.js

414 ms

common.js

common.js

374 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

374 ms

style.css

style.css

457 ms

main.css

main.css

341 ms

logoFINAL-2-copy-1.png

logoFINAL-2-copy-1.png

205 ms

bkg.gif

bkg.gif

358 ms

48.jpg

48.jpg

468 ms

firstsight.jpg

firstsight.jpg

293 ms

Readers-choice.png

Readers-choice.png

206 ms

Reflector-winner-1.png

Reflector-winner-1.png

332 ms

75-1.jpg

75-1.jpg

1462 ms

StephanieHwangHeadshot-update.jpg

StephanieHwangHeadshot-update.jpg

1523 ms

InnexusLogo.png

InnexusLogo.png

332 ms

embed

embed

336 ms

01ed1f9c84.css

01ed1f9c84.css

600 ms

font

font

268 ms

font

font

306 ms

font

font

307 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

407 ms

gerifinaledits-152-Bottom-of-Home.jpg

gerifinaledits-152-Bottom-of-Home.jpg

278 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

97 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2235 ms

114 ms

196 ms

125 ms

93 ms

js

js

53 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

81 ms

js

js

88 ms

26 ms

47 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

16 ms

22 ms

29 ms

22 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

63 ms

Accessibility Review

richardsoneye.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

richardsoneye.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

richardsoneye.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardsoneye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardsoneye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardsoneye.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardsoneye. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: