1.6 sec in total
134 ms
1 sec
378 ms
Welcome to richardspaintingcontractor.com homepage info - get ready to check Richards Painting Contractor best content right away, or after learning these important things about richardspaintingcontractor.com
Transform your space with Richards Painting, Inc. in Sacramento. With over 30 years of experience, we offer top-quality residential and commercial painting services. Explore our professional painting ...
Visit richardspaintingcontractor.comWe analyzed Richardspaintingcontractor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
richardspaintingcontractor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value2.3 s
94/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value470 ms
61/100
30%
Value0.282
43/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
134 ms
263 ms
134 ms
245 ms
189 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Richardspaintingcontractor.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) belongs to the original domain Richardspaintingcontractor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (65%)
2.3 MB
818.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Richardspaintingcontractor.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardspaintingcontractor.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (37%)
27
17
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richards Painting Contractor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
richardspaintingcontractor.com
134 ms
richardspaintingcontractor.com
263 ms
69d273a0414610d2.css
134 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
245 ms
webpack-cefddfb7403e4fd5.js
189 ms
framework-314c182fa7e2bf37.js
319 ms
main-f080ee131b7ae89c.js
318 ms
_app-3bc446757ff8216a.js
551 ms
938-6316377ac1231b46.js
316 ms
6912-3c24dc16cb6b91d9.js
316 ms
2735-1173bb98d6fcad2d.js
317 ms
index-9c0c8d22635e978b.js
325 ms
_buildManifest.js
326 ms
_ssgManifest.js
327 ms
uppernav.webp
390 ms
logo-red.webp
379 ms
rsc-0.webp
385 ms
rsc-0.webp
391 ms
rsc-0.webp
391 ms
rsc-1.webp
443 ms
rsc-1.webp
449 ms
rsc-1.webp
448 ms
rsc-2.webp
463 ms
rsc-2.webp
451 ms
rsc-2.webp
506 ms
maps-icon.webp
510 ms
bbb.webp
514 ms
rsc-0.webp
364 ms
rsc-5.webp
373 ms
Roboto-Regular.ttf
312 ms
Oswald-Medium.ttf
263 ms
fa-brands-400.8bf6ccf0.ttf
319 ms
richardspaintingcontractor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
richardspaintingcontractor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
richardspaintingcontractor.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardspaintingcontractor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardspaintingcontractor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richardspaintingcontractor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richards Painting Contractor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: