Tools & Wizards About Us
richardswilliams.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

richardswilliams.com

Home: Family Therapy | Couples Therapy | Modesto, CA 95355

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

884 ms

Page Rendered

165 ms

richardswilliams.com screenshot

About Website

Visit richardswilliams.com now to see the best up-to-date Richardswilliams content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richardswilliams.com

Richard S. Williams provides counseling and therapy services for individuals, couples and families in Modesto, CA.

Visit richardswilliams.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richardswilliams.com page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richardswilliams.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richardswilliams.com

115 ms

www.richardswilliams.com

236 ms

8c0bcff7f4f8c107af7180cd2dcaf558.opt-min.cr.js

83 ms

599bfcdf63eeda20cb553d9569bc66df.opt-min.cr.css

95 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Richardswilliams.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Apps.therapysites.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Cdcssl.ibsrv.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (366 ms) relates to the external source Apps.therapysites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 127.8 kB (40%)

Content Size

320.3 kB

After Optimization

192.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richardswilliams.com main page is 320.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 223.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 24.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 75.5 kB

  • Original 223.0 kB
  • After minification 223.0 kB
  • After compression 147.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.5 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 235 B

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richardswilliams.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (67%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richardswilliams. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richardswilliams.com

richardswilliams.com

115 ms

www.richardswilliams.com

www.richardswilliams.com

236 ms

8c0bcff7f4f8c107af7180cd2dcaf558.opt-min.cr.js

8c0bcff7f4f8c107af7180cd2dcaf558.opt-min.cr.js

83 ms

599bfcdf63eeda20cb553d9569bc66df.opt-min.cr.css

599bfcdf63eeda20cb553d9569bc66df.opt-min.cr.css

95 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

20 ms

smb-number-changer.js

smb-number-changer.js

366 ms

a01caf8629b0c57a23edb1efccc6f300.opt-min.co.js

a01caf8629b0c57a23edb1efccc6f300.opt-min.co.js

279 ms

js-defer.js

js-defer.js

89 ms

6042502bd99bc_bgblue.png.webp

6042502bd99bc_bgblue.png.webp

108 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

87 ms

javascript,window.pagespeed.psatemp%3D0%3B

javascript,window.pagespeed.psatemp%3D0%3B

0 ms

smb-number-changer.js

smb-number-changer.js

222 ms

optima.woff

optima.woff

110 ms

scriptin.woff

scriptin.woff

107 ms

Accessibility Review

richardswilliams.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

richardswilliams.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

richardswilliams.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richardswilliams.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richardswilliams.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richardswilliams.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richardswilliams. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: