Tools & Wizards About Us
richgroat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

richgroat.com

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

186 ms

richgroat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to richgroat.com homepage info - get ready to check Richgroat best content right away, or after learning these important things about richgroat.com

Your Persona IT Guy, On Site and Remote Computer and Network Support.

Visit richgroat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richgroat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richgroat.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

richgroat.com

2675 ms

mootools-core.js

744 ms

core.js

330 ms

mootools-more.js

1025 ms

caption.js

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Richgroat.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Richgroat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.2 kB (71%)

Content Size

347.0 kB

After Optimization

100.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richgroat.com main page is 347.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 340.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 59% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 241.5 kB

  • Original 340.2 kB
  • After minification 335.0 kB
  • After compression 98.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richgroat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richgroat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richgroat.com

richgroat.com

2675 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

744 ms

core.js

core.js

330 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

1025 ms

caption.js

caption.js

233 ms

offline.css

offline.css

241 ms

general.css

general.css

237 ms

SEO Factors

richgroat.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richgroat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richgroat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richgroat.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richgroat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: