Tools & Wizards About Us
richharvester.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

richharvester.org

Rich Harvester International Ministries | Christ In You

Page Load Speed

12.4 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

10.7 sec

Page Rendered

562 ms

richharvester.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rich Harvester content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richharvester.org

A Great place for your Family Where Life IN Christ is always Reflecting. Preach all about God's Grace messages.

Visit richharvester.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Richharvester.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richharvester.org performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.092

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richharvester.org

1072 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

968 ms

style.min.css

962 ms

styles.css

990 ms

rs6.css

934 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Richharvester.org, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Richharvester.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richharvester.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 79.7 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rich Harvester images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 975 B

  • Original 157.3 kB
  • After minification 157.3 kB
  • After compression 156.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 183.9 kB
  • After minification 183.9 kB
  • After compression 177.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richharvester.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (86%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rich Harvester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richharvester.org

richharvester.org

1072 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

968 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

962 ms

styles.css

styles.css

990 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

934 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1507 ms

ave-core.min.css

ave-core.min.css

890 ms

liquid-icon.min.css

liquid-icon.min.css

899 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1727 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1709 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

1754 ms

fresco.css

fresco.css

1789 ms

lity.min.css

lity.min.css

1809 ms

style.css

style.css

2266 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

3032 ms

custom.css

custom.css

2810 ms

css

css

47 ms

liquid-css-2371.css

liquid-css-2371.css

2803 ms

liquid-responsive-100.css

liquid-responsive-100.css

2739 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2958 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

3354 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

3578 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

4841 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

4524 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

4651 ms

js

js

64 ms

css

css

61 ms

css

css

62 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

4607 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

4560 ms

index.js

index.js

5093 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

5092 ms

SplitText.min.js

SplitText.min.js

5370 ms

fresco.js

fresco.js

5694 ms

lity.min.js

lity.min.js

5485 ms

mailchimp-form.js

mailchimp-form.js

5714 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

5728 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

5749 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

6154 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

5495 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

4626 ms

ScrollMagic.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

5437 ms

fontfaceobserver.js

fontfaceobserver.js

5515 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

5527 ms

tinycolor-min.js

tinycolor-min.js

5510 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

5366 ms

rhimlogo-1.png

rhimlogo-1.png

2438 ms

css-vars-ponyfill.min.js

css-vars-ponyfill.min.js

4768 ms

our-pastor-1.jpg

our-pastor-1.jpg

3575 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

117 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e4.woff

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e4.woff

116 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3173 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xA.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkBgv58a-xA.woff

116 ms

ga6Vaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIu0RWuc-VK.woff

ga6Vaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIu0RWuc-VK.woff

49 ms

ga6Kaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFImajC9.woff

ga6Kaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFImajC9.woff

63 ms

ga6Law1J5X9T9RW6j9bNdOwzfReedw.woff

ga6Law1J5X9T9RW6j9bNdOwzfReedw.woff

64 ms

ga6Iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFcWbg.woff

ga6Iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFcWbg.woff

64 ms

collect

collect

37 ms

1582677553-huge-min-scaled.jpg

1582677553-huge-min-scaled.jpg

1021 ms

Group-347-1024x609.png

Group-347-1024x609.png

2491 ms

Accessibility Review

richharvester.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

richharvester.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

richharvester.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richharvester.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richharvester.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richharvester.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rich Harvester. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: