2.5 sec in total
70 ms
1.5 sec
952 ms
Visit richmansignature.com now to see the best up-to-date Richman Signature content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richmansignature.com
Wherever you are, Richman Signature Properties will always be close by. We have luxury properties from coast to coast and will always consider you a part of our family. Check to see if one of our Sign...
Visit richmansignature.comWe analyzed Richmansignature.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
richmansignature.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
70 ms
84 ms
138 ms
82 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Richmansignature.com, 53% (25 requests) were made to Fwdf42hfnyr24qv5xl8ey5ui-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (454 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 164.0 kB (5%)
3.1 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Richmansignature.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richman Signature images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 879 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richmansignature.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (42%)
38
22
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richman Signature. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richmansignature.com
70 ms
www.richmansignature.com
84 ms
www.richmansignature.com
138 ms
css
82 ms
icon
94 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
74 ms
style.min.css
75 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
76 ms
style.css
78 ms
js
375 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
app.min.js
176 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
73 ms
gtm.js
454 ms
ChandlerRendering_WebsiteImage-1024x539.jpg
208 ms
Watercolor-9328-Web-1024x683.jpg
210 ms
The-Foundry-0302-Web-1024x661.jpg
213 ms
Boca-Vue-3310-Web-1024x683.jpg
210 ms
Waverly-BuildingPhoto-15-1024x682.jpg
212 ms
oeh-lobby-1-1024x683.jpg
207 ms
apartment-cooking-hacks-1024x683.jpeg
214 ms
featured-pet-friendly-apartment-buildings-1024x683.png
378 ms
streetviewgoogle.png
379 ms
Preparing-to-Move-1024x683.jpeg
212 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
374 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
375 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
374 ms
gen_204
174 ms
logo300x131.png
40 ms
Skyline-view-of-San-Diego-California-at-dusk-000012725005_Large-1024x680.jpg
43 ms
Fort-Lauderdale-Beach-with-Palm-Trees-1024x682.jpg
42 ms
Miami-Florida-Cityscape-1024x682.jpg
43 ms
Downtown-Orlando-910999760_3866x2580-1024x683.jpeg
42 ms
Evening-view-of-Skyline-Tampa-1024x679.jpg
40 ms
Apollo-Marquee-1024x681.jpg
45 ms
dallas.jpg
44 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf
45 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
40 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
41 ms
conversion_async.js
160 ms
fbevents.js
178 ms
swap.js
282 ms
js
57 ms
app.js
273 ms
175 ms
366810764237546
217 ms
72 ms
richmansignature.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
richmansignature.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
richmansignature.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richmansignature.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Richmansignature.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richmansignature.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richman Signature. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: