Tools & Wizards About Us
richoffset.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

richoffset.com

Food Packaging Companies India | Pharma, Printing & Packaging Companies

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

275 ms

richoffset.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Richoffset content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richoffset.com

Richoffset is best Food Packaging company in India. It's also, well known for providing Pharma packaging, Printing, and Packaging, Food packaging supplies.

Visit richoffset.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richoffset.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richoffset.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.325

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richoffset.com

2411 ms

www.richoffset.com

257 ms

jquery.min.js

32 ms

api.js

44 ms

c1e05.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Richoffset.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Richoffset.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.1 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richoffset.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 552.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 41.3 kB

  • Original 55.2 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 361 B

  • Original 552.5 kB
  • After minification 552.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richoffset images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 448.3 kB
  • After minification 448.3 kB
  • After compression 447.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 125 B

  • Original 45.5 kB
  • After minification 45.5 kB
  • After compression 45.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richoffset.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (38%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richoffset. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

richoffset.com

richoffset.com

2411 ms

www.richoffset.com

www.richoffset.com

257 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

c1e05.css

c1e05.css

70 ms

css

css

45 ms

2f2ee.css

2f2ee.css

137 ms

e16e3.js

e16e3.js

135 ms

c3d14.js

c3d14.js

138 ms

42aa8.css

42aa8.css

192 ms

3da88.js

3da88.js

367 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

55 ms

dd690.js

dd690.js

204 ms

1f540.js

1f540.js

205 ms

b68ea.js

b68ea.js

205 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

30 ms

hotjar-731589.js

hotjar-731589.js

145 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

103 ms

richoffset.gif

richoffset.gif

338 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

215 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

203 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

206 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

168 ms

c2a_bg.jpg

c2a_bg.jpg

122 ms

down-arrow.png

down-arrow.png

169 ms

c2a_01.jpg

c2a_01.jpg

237 ms

c2a_02.jpg

c2a_02.jpg

238 ms

c2a_03.jpg

c2a_03.jpg

334 ms

c2a_04.jpg

c2a_04.jpg

335 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

334 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

335 ms

client_01.jpg

client_01.jpg

336 ms

client_02.jpg

client_02.jpg

336 ms

client_03.jpg

client_03.jpg

355 ms

client_04.jpg

client_04.jpg

363 ms

client_05.jpg

client_05.jpg

364 ms

client_06.jpg

client_06.jpg

387 ms

client_07.jpg

client_07.jpg

395 ms

client_08.jpg

client_08.jpg

398 ms

iso_2015_new.jpg

iso_2015_new.jpg

404 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

36 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

47 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

416 ms

gototop.png

gototop.png

382 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

richoffset.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

richoffset.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

richoffset.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richoffset.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richoffset.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richoffset.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richoffset. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: