13.6 sec in total
185 ms
5.6 sec
7.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Rich Watch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about richwatch.net
Visit richwatch.netWe analyzed Richwatch.net page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 13.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
richwatch.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value37.3 s
0/100
10%
Value59,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value88.7 s
0/100
10%
185 ms
871 ms
118 ms
111 ms
121 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Richwatch.net, 23% (20 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 19% (16 requests) were made to I.imgur.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Youtube.com.
Page size can be reduced by 640.8 kB (24%)
2.7 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Richwatch.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rich Watch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 240.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 301.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richwatch.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 301.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)
75
52
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rich Watch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
richwatch.net
185 ms
richwatch.richardland.com
871 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
118 ms
css
111 ms
genericons.css
121 ms
style.css
123 ms
jquery.js
206 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
121 ms
show_ads.js
12 ms
widgets.js
118 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
114 ms
functions.js
139 ms
wp-embed.min.js
182 ms
IOUZJUi.jpg
96 ms
113N088.jpg
103 ms
NZRPwIP.jpg
102 ms
SYZvCSZ.jpg
98 ms
7kOo5BC.jpg
97 ms
oWOW0eS.jpg
119 ms
7Hxk4j9.jpg
104 ms
QJJpAGt.jpg
497 ms
YbXgP5R.png
483 ms
x7BsjDG.png
369 ms
yBMfkbn.jpg
107 ms
Cp8nLGX.jpg
101 ms
q9io06E.jpg
103 ms
ITp5AQA.png
292 ms
7iqIWMk.jpg
292 ms
wkJWVqP.jpg
369 ms
ca-pub-1332749221771675.js
348 ms
zrt_lookup.html
341 ms
show_ads_impl.js
231 ms
fVu1p3782bqS2z-CaJvp9hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
535 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPUnwhEOjQ2CQgMjdTKA0dzI.woff
763 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ1xa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
758 ms
erE3KsIWUumgD1j_Ca-V-z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
759 ms
qEM3l4WOcZE
599 ms
lofyBKoKnas
1921 ms
FM_AJiV9k0w
1920 ms
855qMXaFl-E
1918 ms
m8IgpOXRz0w
1899 ms
ads
504 ms
HHWpgeXFdok
1687 ms
MZOKL_TQefI
1685 ms
DdDLaOi_bxk
1807 ms
wFK_Hpb-HIY
1788 ms
qRVAOKjcjQU
1787 ms
9IwEORL_GE8
1787 ms
YhmJZHDh1gg
1922 ms
Genericons.svg
476 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
9 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNzxa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
472 ms
Wreg0Be4tcFGM2t6VWytvBGYIVA-f1n-gQW6IKoy_-M.woff
474 ms
osd.js
238 ms
ads
357 ms
bs7YXqCgFI0
1793 ms
YXYsHiTwJjo
2053 ms
tkRZVE3aDm8
2047 ms
cZlzhULrJC0
2045 ms
tGRLzrP_ZoQ
2921 ms
3EiEX4tmCfY
2834 ms
W6fTYz4Z9-o
3000 ms
oFkJdVc-xrA
2998 ms
sdk.js
1716 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
1434 ms
www-embed-player.js
1552 ms
base.js
1967 ms
7721098148976851202
1715 ms
abg.js
1717 ms
m_js_controller.js
2503 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
1711 ms
tweet.5388e9dc328ae015e187ad2857792a5b.js
1637 ms
1393 ms
x_button_blue2.png
999 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
1132 ms
ad_status.js
1131 ms
xd_arbiter.php
557 ms
xd_arbiter.php
903 ms
s
219 ms
redir.html
521 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
57 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
56 ms
syndication
176 ms
tweets.json
271 ms
iframe.html
108 ms
F5EcQNuXvzCwnROrenDy46C3KsouVqfn29hTt0MreZk.js
108 ms
richwatch.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
richwatch.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
richwatch.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richwatch.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richwatch.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
richwatch.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rich Watch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: