Tools & Wizards About Us
richworth.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

richworth.in

Corporate, Workwear, Healthcare, Hospitality Uniforms in Chennai

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

404 ms

richworth.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to richworth.in homepage info - get ready to check Richworth best content right away, or after learning these important things about richworth.in

Customizable uniforms for Corporate, Workwear, Healthcare, Hospitality professionals in Chennai, India. Explore our uniforms online.

Visit richworth.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Richworth.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richworth.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.538

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.richworth.in

1004 ms

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

427 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

420 ms

386ed42b2dc50907822b086d081aed09.css

862 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Richworth.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Acp-magento.appspot.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Richworth.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 588.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richworth.in main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 56.2 kB

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 64.5 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 370.6 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Richworth images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 127.8 kB

  • Original 363.9 kB
  • After minification 363.9 kB
  • After compression 236.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 127.8 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 78.5 kB
  • After minification 78.3 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richworth.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (18%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.richworth.in

www.richworth.in

1004 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

427 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

420 ms

386ed42b2dc50907822b086d081aed09.css

386ed42b2dc50907822b086d081aed09.css

862 ms

ae3f177fd13f36949ad655d564ee7a6d.js

ae3f177fd13f36949ad655d564ee7a6d.js

1314 ms

acp-magento.js

acp-magento.js

82 ms

acp-magento.js

acp-magento.js

122 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

59 ms

v2.zopim.com

v2.zopim.com

106 ms

isp.jquery.requires.full.js

isp.jquery.requires.full.js

106 ms

logo.png

logo.png

248 ms

callus.png

callus.png

248 ms

signup.png

signup.png

214 ms

login_1.png

login_1.png

248 ms

cartn.png

cartn.png

210 ms

searchn.png

searchn.png

419 ms

dropdown.jpg

dropdown.jpg

2109 ms

labcoat.png

labcoat.png

645 ms

NurseUniform.png

NurseUniform.png

643 ms

ServiceUniform.png

ServiceUniform.png

433 ms

healthcare.jpg

healthcare.jpg

2175 ms

hospitality.jpg

hospitality.jpg

2083 ms

workwear-banner.jpg

workwear-banner.jpg

1510 ms

corporates-banner.jpg

corporates-banner.jpg

2358 ms

sideblock_31.jpg

sideblock_31.jpg

859 ms

sideblock_32.jpg

sideblock_32.jpg

1075 ms

sideblock_33.jpg

sideblock_33.jpg

1291 ms

sideblock_34.jpg

sideblock_34.jpg

1506 ms

gif-new-2.gif

gif-new-2.gif

1936 ms

customize.png

customize.png

1725 ms

homeblock1.png

homeblock1.png

1941 ms

arrowblock.png

arrowblock.png

2151 ms

homeblock2.png

homeblock2.png

2160 ms

homeblock3.png

homeblock3.png

2291 ms

freecustomization.png

freecustomization.png

2317 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

2366 ms

twitter_1.png

twitter_1.png

2373 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

2389 ms

enquirenow.png

enquirenow.png

2499 ms

link-separator.png

link-separator.png

2498 ms

Asap-Regular_gdi.woff

Asap-Regular_gdi.woff

2540 ms

ThemeIcons.woff

ThemeIcons.woff

2552 ms

collect

collect

68 ms

asset_composer.js

asset_composer.js

68 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

2506 ms

Asap-Medium_gdi.woff

Asap-Medium_gdi.woff

2524 ms

AlegreyaSans-Regular_gdi.woff

AlegreyaSans-Regular_gdi.woff

2626 ms

bgn.png

bgn.png

2863 ms

isp.v.2.0.1.min.js

isp.v.2.0.1.min.js

31 ms

js

js

63 ms

Asap-Bold_gdi.woff

Asap-Bold_gdi.woff

2582 ms

AlegreyaSans-Medium_gdi.woff

AlegreyaSans-Medium_gdi.woff

2587 ms

AlegreyaSans-Bold_gdi.woff

AlegreyaSans-Bold_gdi.woff

2556 ms

ac09acf5748bcd1a8765204ec68f0686.css

ac09acf5748bcd1a8765204ec68f0686.css

216 ms

Accessibility Review

richworth.in accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

richworth.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

richworth.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richworth.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Richworth.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

richworth.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Richworth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: