8.7 sec in total
2.2 sec
6.3 sec
243 ms
Click here to check amazing Ridea content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ridea.jp
本ページはプロモーションが含まれています。不動産売るならどこの業者へ依頼すればよいのか?安心・信頼できる会社選びのコツなどをわかりやすく解説しています。
Visit ridea.jpWe analyzed Ridea.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ridea.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
2151 ms
419 ms
1211 ms
556 ms
439 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Ridea.jp, 22% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 16% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridea.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 270.2 kB (22%)
1.3 MB
986.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ridea.jp main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 963.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridea images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 102.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridea.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (43%)
90
51
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ridea.jp
2151 ms
styles.css
419 ms
jquery.js
1211 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
556 ms
style_bizvektor_sns.css
439 ms
css
25 ms
bizvektor_common.css
634 ms
res-vektor.css
700 ms
001.css
827 ms
style.css
549 ms
jquery.form.min.js
419 ms
scripts.js
511 ms
biz-vektor-min.js
712 ms
plain.css
552 ms
ga.js
11 ms
ridealogo2.png
189 ms
billboad1.png
186 ms
billboad3.png
1701 ms
bnr_tatemono.png
948 ms
banner_itbucho.gif
645 ms
img_repo.png
1053 ms
billboad4-200x200.jpg
356 ms
954771_519351061436132_848283184_n-200x200.jpg
370 ms
title_03-200x200.png
1086 ms
%E3%82%B5%E3%82%A4%E3%83%88%E6%A7%8B%E6%88%90.png
960 ms
bnr_fbfnavi.png
1269 ms
bnr_fbfnavi2.png
1069 ms
bnr_column1.png
1325 ms
urubito_s.png
1239 ms
bnr_lifeslice.png
1241 ms
bnr_petxpet.png
1430 ms
footer_pagetop.png
1432 ms
all.js
58 ms
iconMenuOpen.png
1409 ms
icon_try1_white.gif
1476 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
btn.js
88 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
21 ms
vk_sns.woff
1646 ms
icon_arrow1_gray.gif
1635 ms
icon_arrow1_white.gif
1634 ms
icon_arrow2_gray.gif
1682 ms
41 ms
xd_arbiter.php
27 ms
xd_arbiter.php
41 ms
button
15 ms
button.css
51 ms
shared.js
51 ms
button.js
53 ms
like_box.php
446 ms
xd_arbiter.php
12 ms
pocket_button.png
5 ms
SwWqNEM2GQB.css
39 ms
qfDTH5pB6Ut.css
32 ms
drXqyuWvz8i.css
56 ms
3FAK8vb1hBH.css
53 ms
0cKHCb_yAjC.css
42 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
42 ms
ehA1CqzHyzE.js
69 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
66 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
67 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
66 ms
1QuX41zDRrx.js
75 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
77 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
80 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
79 ms
427133_366121580077208_558046726_n.jpg
268 ms
safe_image.php
2008 ms
safe_image.php
23 ms
safe_image.php
1692 ms
419144_367076336648399_1369341140_n.jpg
35 ms
11127214_641289239338294_2460855622646979649_n.jpg
29 ms
11146290_1422210204761387_5314947974146489651_n.jpg
30 ms
2522_626021447444068_1303620524_n.jpg
29 ms
1554388_635117366567527_838471519_n.jpg
27 ms
1383533_1374552246121217_1751398775_n.jpg
31 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
28 ms
12400686_1518235311840680_5837297223298432425_n.jpg
89 ms
12729096_1050439648354325_3305491354473948873_n.jpg
137 ms
1930421_803016516510018_663771000090380034_n.jpg
30 ms
12509378_839801439481931_2383394595037452942_n.jpg
30 ms
406413_191303674311097_442289439_n.jpg
31 ms
1472995_566232536792573_1103875513_n.jpg
35 ms
296058_266192580085316_26410432_n.jpg
35 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
12 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
15 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
18 ms
K00K-UgnsKu.png
17 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
17 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
16 ms
bg_control_nav.png
185 ms
bg_direction_nav2_30.png
174 ms
ridea.jp accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ridea.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ridea.jp SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridea.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridea.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridea.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridea. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: