9.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
8.4 sec
345 ms
Welcome to ridejohndoe.com homepage info - get ready to check Ridejohndoe best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about ridejohndoe.com
Meta Description
Visit ridejohndoe.comWe analyzed Ridejohndoe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ridejohndoe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
1107 ms
65 ms
77 ms
222 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Ridejohndoe.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridejohndoe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (16%)
8.3 MB
7.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ridejohndoe.com main page is 8.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.5 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 266.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridejohndoe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 589.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 589.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 362.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridejohndoe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 362.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (55%)
80
36
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridejohndoe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ridejohndoe.com
1107 ms
css
65 ms
css
77 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
222 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
224 ms
bootstrap.css
812 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
333 ms
font-awesome.css
445 ms
animate.css
865 ms
styles.css
1082 ms
widgets.css
554 ms
event_styles.css
633 ms
ajaxcart.css
660 ms
blog.css
774 ms
megamenu.css
963 ms
imageslider.css
981 ms
testimonial.css
989 ms
prototype.js
1689 ms
ccard.js
1074 ms
validation.js
1511 ms
builder.js
1195 ms
effects.js
1429 ms
dragdrop.js
1516 ms
controls.js
1523 ms
slider.js
1418 ms
js.js
1850 ms
form.js
1858 ms
menu.js
1651 ms
translate.js
1731 ms
cookies.js
1737 ms
jquery.min.js
2340 ms
noconflict.js
1873 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
2168 ms
bootstrap.js
2382 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.js
2179 ms
themevast.js
2076 ms
iwd-jquery-2.1.3.min.js
2559 ms
modal.js
2402 ms
mobileresponsive.css
2379 ms
ajaxcart.js
2503 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
16 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
2655 ms
jquery.ddslick.min.js
2400 ms
megamenu.js
2279 ms
quickview.js
2270 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
2474 ms
icon-bag.png
168 ms
logo.png
218 ms
originals_collection_header.jpg
1941 ms
women_collection_header.jpg
1692 ms
raw_collection_header_1.jpg
1830 ms
jd_gear_collection_header.jpg
2113 ms
teaser_1.jpg
768 ms
teaser_1.jpg
992 ms
blog_the_secret_of_the_mashines.jpg
1430 ms
blog_the_secret_of_the_mashines.jpg
1639 ms
blog_stories_of_Bike.jpg
2278 ms
stories_of_bike.jpg
2432 ms
blog_john.f.doe.jpg
2344 ms
post_john_f_doe.jpg
2489 ms
jdw3003_back_2.jpg
2367 ms
jdw3003_front_2.jpg
2556 ms
d2021_back_1_1_1_1.jpg
2606 ms
d2021_front_1_1_1_1.jpg
2764 ms
d2020_back_version3_2_6.jpg
2805 ms
d2020_front_version3_2_6.jpg
2873 ms
menshoodie_kevlar_2color_back_3.jpg
2919 ms
menshoodie_kevlar_2color_front_3.jpg
2994 ms
jdl5003_back_4.jpg
3052 ms
jdl5003_front_4.jpg
3201 ms
jdd4005_back.jpg
3233 ms
jdd4005_front.jpg
3313 ms
jdd4006_back_1.jpg
3240 ms
jdd4006_front_1.jpg
3424 ms
jdl5001_back.jpg
3489 ms
jdl5001_front.jpg
3640 ms
paypal.png
3448 ms
visa.png
3455 ms
master.png
3528 ms
sofort.png
3653 ms
MYWJ4lYm5dbZ1UBuYox79D8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
33 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4083 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
10 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
92 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
93 ms
print.css
110 ms
ridejohndoe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ridejohndoe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ridejohndoe.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridejohndoe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridejohndoe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridejohndoe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridejohndoe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: