Tools & Wizards About Us
ridertack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

ridertack.com

Horse Racing Equipment & Jockey Supply Store | RiderTack

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

698 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

138 ms

ridertack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ridertack.com now to see the best up-to-date Rider Tack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ridertack.com

Buy only the best horse tack for your thoroughbred. We carry high-quality horse racing equipment & offer the finest in jockey supplies & apparel. Shop now!

Visit ridertack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridertack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 698 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridertack.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

Default.asp

698 ms

jquery-ui.css

37 ms

default.css

64 ms

26320240219075417.css

70 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Ridertack.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to D21ivvgspl06jm.cloudfront.net and 8% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (698 ms) belongs to the original domain Ridertack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 415.2 kB (50%)

Content Size

822.2 kB

After Optimization

407.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridertack.com main page is 822.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 400.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

  • Original 110.4 kB
  • After minification 109.6 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 495 B

  • Original 119.7 kB
  • After minification 119.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rider Tack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 191.2 kB
  • After minification 191.2 kB
  • After compression 180.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 328.8 kB

  • Original 400.9 kB
  • After minification 395.2 kB
  • After compression 72.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridertack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 328.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (70%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rider Tack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Default.asp

Default.asp

698 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

37 ms

default.css

default.css

64 ms

26320240219075417.css

26320240219075417.css

70 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

37 ms

jquery-migrate-merged.js

jquery-migrate-merged.js

90 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

62 ms

volusion.js

volusion.js

90 ms

content.css

content.css

63 ms

paypal-rest-default-buttons.js

paypal-rest-default-buttons.js

66 ms

soft_add.js

soft_add.js

111 ms

soft_add_mult.js

soft_add_mult.js

123 ms

soft_add.css

soft_add.css

111 ms

javascripts.js

javascripts.js

155 ms

js

js

110 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

98 ms

f2c8c7e93216e073_complete.js

f2c8c7e93216e073_complete.js

84 ms

js

js

656 ms

89 ms

template.css

template.css

115 ms

theme-icons-base.css

theme-icons-base.css

65 ms

design-toolkit.min.js

design-toolkit.min.js

118 ms

js

js

97 ms

js

js

174 ms

js

js

119 ms

vnav.css

vnav.css

131 ms

vnav.js

vnav.js

173 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

150 ms

volusion-owl.css

volusion-owl.css

173 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

151 ms

template.min.js

template.min.js

134 ms

whatsapp.css

whatsapp.css

227 ms

whatsapp.js

whatsapp.js

228 ms

volusion-GA4.js

volusion-GA4.js

63 ms

class-name-watcher.js

class-name-watcher.js

132 ms

paypal-push-cart.js

paypal-push-cart.js

154 ms

stripe-push-cart.js

stripe-push-cart.js

141 ms

push-cart.js

push-cart.js

158 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

75 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

87 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

43 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

36 ms

clear1x1.gif

clear1x1.gif

104 ms

EWGGSRBN-1.jpg

EWGGSRBN-1.jpg

196 ms

whatsapp.jpg

whatsapp.jpg

239 ms

EWGGFTBJ-1.jpg

EWGGFTBJ-1.jpg

268 ms

DSJRGLFF-1.jpg

DSJRGLFF-1.jpg

240 ms

FeaturedProducts.gif

FeaturedProducts.gif

101 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

120 ms

header_bg.png

header_bg.png

88 ms

va9b4kzIxd1KFppkaRKvDRPJVDf_vB_ekGrWN33AiJMK.ttf

va9b4kzIxd1KFppkaRKvDRPJVDf_vB_ekGrWN33AiJMK.ttf

247 ms

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGAq8Kk1Q.ttf

1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGAq8Kk1Q.ttf

168 ms

facebook-dark.svg

facebook-dark.svg

35 ms

twitter-dark.svg

twitter-dark.svg

91 ms

instagram-dark.svg

instagram-dark.svg

94 ms

pinterest-dark.svg

pinterest-dark.svg

97 ms

rss-dark.svg

rss-dark.svg

97 ms

Divider_Horizontal.gif

Divider_Horizontal.gif

136 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

83 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

50 ms

svgdefs.svg

svgdefs.svg

110 ms

1710045633400.jpg

1710045633400.jpg

71 ms

main.js

main.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

ridertack.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ridertack.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ridertack.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridertack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridertack.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ridertack.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rider Tack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: