Tools & Wizards About Us
ridgefield.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ridgefield.org

Home - Ridgefield Public Schools

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

120 ms

ridgefield.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ridgefield content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ridgefield.org

Welcome to the Internet home of the Ridgefield Public Schools. Together, the nine schools that comprise our district provide a safe, empowering learning environment for over 5000 pre-kindergarten thro...

Visit ridgefield.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridgefield.org page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridgefield.org performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.169

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.4 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ridgefield.org

49 ms

www.ridgefield.org

49 ms

www.ridgefield.org

825 ms

normalize.css

315 ms

sm-core-css.css

313 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgefield.org, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridgefield.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 144.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridgefield.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 54.3 kB
  • After minification 52.7 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgefield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 50.6 kB

  • Original 131.1 kB
  • After minification 128.8 kB
  • After compression 80.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgefield.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgefield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ridgefield.org

ridgefield.org

49 ms

www.ridgefield.org

www.ridgefield.org

49 ms

www.ridgefield.org

www.ridgefield.org

825 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

315 ms

sm-core-css.css

sm-core-css.css

313 ms

main-ridgefield.css

main-ridgefield.css

368 ms

modules.css

modules.css

350 ms

home.css

home.css

331 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

34 ms

jquery.smartmenus-and-keyboard.js

jquery.smartmenus-and-keyboard.js

409 ms

css

css

44 ms

css

css

61 ms

b122127e05.js

b122127e05.js

98 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

29 ms

animatedcollapse.js

animatedcollapse.js

300 ms

slideshow-autoscroll.css

slideshow-autoscroll.css

534 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

536 ms

carouselButtons.js

carouselButtons.js

548 ms

carouselItem.js

carouselItem.js

582 ms

pauseButton.js

pauseButton.js

572 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

487 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

633 ms

OwlCarousel.css

OwlCarousel.css

802 ms

OwlTheme.css

OwlTheme.css

812 ms

OwlCarousel.js

OwlCarousel.js

889 ms

element.js

element.js

37 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

header-logo1.png

header-logo1.png

547 ms

homeslide_061024_011.jpg

homeslide_061024_011.jpg

720 ms

homeslide_01_0901231.jpg

homeslide_01_0901231.jpg

771 ms

homeslide_04_0901231.jpg

homeslide_04_0901231.jpg

1254 ms

homeslide_05_0901231.jpg

homeslide_05_0901231.jpg

1002 ms

homeslide_02.jpg

homeslide_02.jpg

1048 ms

homeslide_03_0901231.jpg

homeslide_03_0901231.jpg

1096 ms

homeslide_03.jpg

homeslide_03.jpg

1504 ms

homeslide_071.jpg

homeslide_071.jpg

1624 ms

homeslide_061.jpg

homeslide_061.jpg

1590 ms

homeslide_051.jpg

homeslide_051.jpg

1531 ms

homeslide_061024_021.jpg

homeslide_061024_021.jpg

1587 ms

iconhome_sun1.png

iconhome_sun1.png

1523 ms

graphic_iconhome_budgetBook1.png

graphic_iconhome_budgetBook1.png

1795 ms

icon-tiger1.png

icon-tiger1.png

1852 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

10 ms

35 ms

Bottom-Line1.jpg

Bottom-Line1.jpg

1287 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

29 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

ridgefield.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

ridgefield.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ridgefield.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgefield.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridgefield.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ridgefield.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridgefield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: