Tools & Wizards About Us
ridgeford.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ridgeford.com

This domain is brand new

Page Load Speed

353 ms in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

175 ms

Page Rendered

67 ms

ridgeford.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ridgeford content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ridgeford.com

Visit ridgeford.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridgeford.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 242 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridgeford.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ridgeford.com

111 ms

css

29 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

18 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ridgeford.com, 50% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (111 ms) belongs to the original domain Ridgeford.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 267.5 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridgeford.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 537 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 546 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 537 B or 50% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgeford images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 201.2 kB

  • Original 296.5 kB
  • After minification 296.5 kB
  • After compression 95.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 38.7 kB

  • Original 48.4 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgeford.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgeford. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ridgeford.com

ridgeford.com

111 ms

css

css

29 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

18 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

22 ms

Accessibility Review

ridgeford.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ridgeford.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

ridgeford.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgeford.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ridgeford.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ridgeford.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridgeford. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: