5.3 sec in total
868 ms
4 sec
360 ms
Visit ridgepointwellness.com now to see the best up-to-date Ridgepointwellness content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ridgepointwellness.com
Visit ridgepointwellness.comWe analyzed Ridgepointwellness.com page load time and found that the first response time was 868 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ridgepointwellness.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value18.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.6 s
0/100
10%
Value2,980 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.81
4/100
15%
Value28.5 s
0/100
10%
868 ms
28 ms
39 ms
118 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgepointwellness.com, 18% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (868 ms) belongs to the original domain Ridgepointwellness.com.
Page size can be reduced by 567.8 kB (20%)
2.8 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ridgepointwellness.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 587 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgepointwellness images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 231.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.1 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgepointwellness.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 291.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (68%)
69
22
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgepointwellness. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ridgepointwellness.com
868 ms
css
28 ms
css
39 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
style.min.css
160 ms
styles.css
71 ms
style.css
130 ms
bootstrap.css
182 ms
styles.css
131 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
129 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
130 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.css
129 ms
responsive.css
165 ms
font-awesome.min.css
156 ms
css
20 ms
genericons.css
194 ms
blocks.css
157 ms
loftloader.min.css
158 ms
addtoany.min.css
195 ms
jquery.min.js
217 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
200 ms
addtoany.min.js
201 ms
bootstrap.min.js
190 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
262 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.js
260 ms
main.js
261 ms
scripts.js
260 ms
api.js
38 ms
script.js
261 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
322 ms
functions.js
322 ms
loftloader.min.js
261 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
233 ms
page.js
133 ms
analytics.js
138 ms
a3ICNMQW7Ok
289 ms
embed
279 ms
calendar-1ef4600eb186ec3f9c1b3baf4ae52c463c5b5cbd1ea74e9039a5a308d897f743.png
156 ms
logo.png
110 ms
cropped-logo-2.png
118 ms
banne2r1.jpg
322 ms
banne2r2.jpg
364 ms
banne2r4-1.jpg
362 ms
banne2r3-1.jpg
280 ms
about_post.jpg
150 ms
ser-3-1.jpg
149 ms
ser-1-1.jpg
273 ms
Registered-Counselling-1.jpg
272 ms
Craniosacral-Therapy.jpg
319 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
121 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
135 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
235 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
241 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
243 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
242 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
245 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
244 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
245 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
248 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
248 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
248 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
248 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
284 ms
recaptcha__en.js
97 ms
sm.25.html
38 ms
eso.Ep5bSEmr.js
73 ms
collect
24 ms
js
231 ms
anchor
100 ms
js
442 ms
www-player.css
51 ms
www-embed-player.js
85 ms
base.js
158 ms
styles__ltr.css
31 ms
recaptcha__en.js
35 ms
IDLZ5bdCrEGdGR5FKKZfiIWvV7rMSlbAHUEzxUIOBQg.js
310 ms
webworker.js
308 ms
logo_48.png
296 ms
ad_status.js
311 ms
QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js
141 ms
embed.js
76 ms
recaptcha__en.js
74 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
51 ms
certificate.jpg
566 ms
id
51 ms
Create
136 ms
GenerateIT
13 ms
ridgepointwellness.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ridgepointwellness.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ridgepointwellness.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgepointwellness.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridgepointwellness.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridgepointwellness.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridgepointwellness. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: