Tools & Wizards About Us
ridgevilleanimal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    29% of websites

ridgevilleanimal.com

Ridgeville Animal Hospital | North Ridgeville Veterinary Hospital

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

934 ms

Page Rendered

735 ms

ridgevilleanimal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ridgevilleanimal.com homepage info - get ready to check Ridgeville Animal best content right away, or after learning these important things about ridgevilleanimal.com

Ridgeville Animal Hospital is a full-service veterinary hospital that provides exceptional care to cats, dogs, and pocket pets. Schedule an appointment with one of our veterinarians today.

Visit ridgevilleanimal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ridgevilleanimal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ridgevilleanimal.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,280 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.cfm

207 ms

vendor.min.css

26 ms

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

css2

57 ms

style.min.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ridgevilleanimal.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (355 ms) relates to the external source Us.vetstoria.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ridgevilleanimal.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 64.9 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 70.7 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridgeville Animal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 315.9 kB
  • After minification 315.4 kB
  • After compression 306.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 744 B

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 41.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridgevilleanimal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridgeville Animal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index.cfm

index.cfm

207 ms

vendor.min.css

vendor.min.css

26 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

61 ms

media.min.css

media.min.css

57 ms

style_bfs.min.css

style_bfs.min.css

62 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

62 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

63 ms

custom.css

custom.css

58 ms

api.js

api.js

61 ms

oabp-widget-floating-button.min.js

oabp-widget-floating-button.min.js

355 ms

js

js

89 ms

tracker.min.js

tracker.min.js

167 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

83 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

61 ms

custom.js

custom.js

62 ms

mainADA.js

mainADA.js

63 ms

javascript.js

javascript.js

63 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

82 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

ridgeville-animal-hospital-logo.png

ridgeville-animal-hospital-logo.png

22 ms

ridgeville-animal-hospital-hero.jpg

ridgeville-animal-hospital-hero.jpg

71 ms

online-booking-dog.jpg

online-booking-dog.jpg

71 ms

ridgeville-animal-hospital-north-ridgeville.png

ridgeville-animal-hospital-north-ridgeville.png

79 ms

output_image1718221975919.jpg

output_image1718221975919.jpg

69 ms

img_6154.jpg

img_6154.jpg

24 ms

img_0896.jpg

img_0896.jpg

68 ms

img_0525.jpg

img_0525.jpg

70 ms

img_0985.jpg

img_0985.jpg

70 ms

pet-ct-scans.png

pet-ct-scans.png

71 ms

pet-surgery.png

pet-surgery.png

71 ms

appointment-request.jpg

appointment-request.jpg

77 ms

preparing-for-pet-wellness-visit.jpg

preparing-for-pet-wellness-visit.jpg

89 ms

quote-mark.png

quote-mark.png

78 ms

ggl.png

ggl.png

79 ms

doggy.png

doggy.png

93 ms

arrow_left_301.png

arrow_left_301.png

69 ms

embed

embed

216 ms

arrow_right_301.png

arrow_right_301.png

61 ms

js

js

77 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

72 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

72 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

186 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

190 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

208 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

213 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

70 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

60 ms

georgia-webfont.woff

georgia-webfont.woff

130 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

js

js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

ridgevilleanimal.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ridgevilleanimal.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ridgevilleanimal.com SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridgevilleanimal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridgevilleanimal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ridgevilleanimal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ridgeville Animal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: