17.6 sec in total
252 ms
16.5 sec
906 ms
Visit ridhamenterprise.com now to see the best up-to-date Ridham Enterprise content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ridhamenterprise.com
India’s Trusted Tech Solutions Provider Partner with Ridham Enterprise Private Limited (REPL) to harness the power of technology. Together, we can build a world where transformation knows no bounds an...
Visit ridhamenterprise.comWe analyzed Ridhamenterprise.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 17.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
ridhamenterprise.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.252
49/100
15%
Value16.2 s
5/100
10%
252 ms
7203 ms
338 ms
339 ms
340 ms
Our browser made a total of 163 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (160 requests) were addressed to the original Ridhamenterprise.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ridhamenterprise.com.
Page size can be reduced by 389.6 kB (13%)
3.0 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ridhamenterprise.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 233.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ridham Enterprise images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ridhamenterprise.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 128 (83%)
155
27
The browser has sent 155 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ridham Enterprise. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 69 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ridhamenterprise.com
252 ms
ridhamenterprise.com
7203 ms
graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.css
338 ms
graphina-charts-for-elementor-pro-public.css
339 ms
graphina-pro-charts-for-elementor-public.css
340 ms
exad-header-footer.css
341 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
341 ms
frontend.min.css
461 ms
swiper.min.css
472 ms
e-swiper.min.css
482 ms
post-5.css
503 ms
frontend.min.css
504 ms
style.css
564 ms
all.min.css
610 ms
v4-shims.min.css
622 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
628 ms
fadeIn.min.css
627 ms
widget-heading.min.css
697 ms
widget-image.min.css
720 ms
widget-image-carousel.min.css
735 ms
fadeInUp.min.css
764 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
762 ms
widget-posts.min.css
811 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
833 ms
fontawesome.min.css
854 ms
brands.min.css
871 ms
solid.min.css
870 ms
regular.min.css
915 ms
fadeInDown.min.css
937 ms
fadeInLeft.min.css
958 ms
fadeInRight.min.css
976 ms
post-146.css
978 ms
exad-pro-styles.min.css
1141 ms
exad-pro-eicons-styles.min.css
1042 ms
slick.min.css
1077 ms
slick-theme.min.css
1097 ms
imagehover.css
1093 ms
css
34 ms
swiper.min.css
815 ms
exad-styles.min.css
860 ms
helper-parts.min.css
875 ms
main.min.css
992 ms
main.min.css
954 ms
grid.min.css
808 ms
helper-parts.min.css
853 ms
iconsmind.min.css
867 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
873 ms
widget-forms.min.css
903 ms
flatpickr.min.css
876 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
829 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
851 ms
post-171.css
861 ms
post-1273.css
882 ms
post-1607.css
869 ms
post-1450.css
838 ms
ekiticons.css
875 ms
widget-styles.css
997 ms
widget-styles-pro.css
918 ms
responsive.css
895 ms
elementor-all.css
864 ms
elementor-max.css
875 ms
jquery.min.js
940 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
956 ms
apexcharts.min.js
1172 ms
graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.js
962 ms
jquery-numerator.js
933 ms
v4-shims.min.js
959 ms
page-transitions.min.js
980 ms
post-247.css
121 ms
post-1003366.css
198 ms
post-2951.css
197 ms
widget-divider.min.css
216 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
237 ms
layout.min.css
377 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
380 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
379 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
380 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
379 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
381 ms
core.min.js
381 ms
frontend.min.js
561 ms
vamtam-hr-scrolling.min.js
562 ms
exad-scripts.min.js
562 ms
quickview-content.js
562 ms
exad-pro-scripts.min.js
563 ms
main.min.js
563 ms
main.min.js
564 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
594 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
585 ms
mouse.min.js
598 ms
slider.min.js
618 ms
draggable.min.js
616 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
634 ms
all.min.js
696 ms
instant-page.min.js
700 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
713 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
722 ms
vamtam-posts-base.min.js
733 ms
vamtam-button.min.js
735 ms
vamtam-nav-menu.min.js
734 ms
frontend-script.js
738 ms
widget-scripts.js
831 ms
wpforms-user-journey.min.js
717 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
717 ms
elementor.js
648 ms
hooks.min.js
703 ms
i18n.min.js
710 ms
elementor.js
711 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
574 ms
frontend.min.js
577 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
626 ms
dialog.min.js
650 ms
vamtam-elementor-frontend.min.js
663 ms
animate-circle.min.js
663 ms
elementor.js
682 ms
elementor.js
504 ms
elementskit-sticky-content.js
548 ms
underscore.min.js
571 ms
wp-util.min.js
586 ms
frontend.min.js
583 ms
wrapper.js
602 ms
text-limit.es5.min.js
607 ms
jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js
644 ms
font
53 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
654 ms
font
78 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
663 ms
mailcheck.min.js
666 ms
punycode.min.js
662 ms
utils.min.js
681 ms
wpforms.min.js
722 ms
wpforms-modern.min.js
648 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
807 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
698 ms
theme-icons.ttf
716 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
705 ms
Ridham.svg
742 ms
it-solutions-provider-banner.png
973 ms
mask.png
737 ms
Rajkot_Banner.png
1010 ms
ONGC-1.png
911 ms
Indian-Railways_200x120.png
739 ms
Adani_200x120.png
712 ms
NID_200X120.png
734 ms
IIT-Gandhinagar_200x120.png
746 ms
ONGC_200x120.png
768 ms
TGES_200x120.png
830 ms
Torrent-Pharma_200x120.png
841 ms
Aditya-Birla-Group_200x120.png
817 ms
IIMA_200x120.png
845 ms
Microsoft_Cst.png
843 ms
Adobe-1.png
7685 ms
IBM-300x121.png
837 ms
SAMSUNG.png
889 ms
Apple_Cst.png
860 ms
AWS-300x180.png
852 ms
Azure.png
847 ms
Lenovo.png
855 ms
Logitech-300x95.png
902 ms
submit-spin.svg
943 ms
Ridham_Logo_White.png
884 ms
elementor-below-max.css
106 ms
elementor-small.css
110 ms
ridhamenterprise.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ridhamenterprise.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ridhamenterprise.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ridhamenterprise.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ridhamenterprise.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ridhamenterprise.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ridham Enterprise. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: