Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

riehlquality.com

Riehl Quality Storage Barns, LLC

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

401 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

271 ms

riehlquality.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to riehlquality.com homepage info - get ready to check Riehl Quality best content right away, or after learning these important things about riehlquality.com

Browse our collections for everything from simple storage to studios and workshops to garages and getaway cottages.

Visit riehlquality.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Riehlquality.com page load time and found that the first response time was 401 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riehlquality.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,060 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riehlquality.com

401 ms

theme.css

39 ms

preloads.js

53 ms

load_feature-87876fa245af19cbd14aa886ed59c6aa8a27c45d24dcd7a81cf2d2323506233e.js

33 ms

features-1c0b396bd4d054b94abae1eb6a1bd6ba47beb35525c57a217c77a862ff06d83f.js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Riehlquality.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Riehlquality.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 173.8 kB (3%)

Content Size

6.9 MB

After Optimization

6.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Riehlquality.com main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 125.3 kB

  • Original 152.0 kB
  • After minification 136.1 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 6.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riehl Quality images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 218.1 kB
  • After minification 218.1 kB
  • After compression 186.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 54.1 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riehlquality.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

38

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riehl Quality. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

riehlquality.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

riehlquality.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

riehlquality.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riehlquality.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riehlquality.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Riehl Quality. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: