Tools & Wizards About Us
riepa.lv screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

riepa.lv

riepas lētas - jaunas riepas - interneta veikals - riepa.lv

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

458 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

218 ms

riepa.lv screenshot

About Website

Visit riepa.lv now to see the best up-to-date Riepa content for Latvia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about riepa.lv

Jaunas riepas par zemām cenām. Riepu montāžas serviss. Berģu autoserviss, SIA.

Visit riepa.lv

Key Findings

We analyzed Riepa.lv page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

riepa.lv performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

riepa.lv

458 ms

riepa.lv

1091 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

119 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

234 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Riepa.lv, 18% (10 requests) were made to Shop.latakko.eu and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Shop.latakko.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.7 kB (27%)

Content Size

813.3 kB

After Optimization

595.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Riepa.lv main page is 813.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 624.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 180.7 kB

  • Original 624.6 kB
  • After minification 443.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Riepa needs image optimization as it can save up to 180.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 134.5 kB
  • After compression 131.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riepa.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (18%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riepa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

riepa.lv

riepa.lv

458 ms

riepa.lv

riepa.lv

1091 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

119 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

234 ms

front.home.css

front.home.css

331 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

455 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

572 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

338 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

343 ms

front.front.js

front.front.js

345 ms

hits.puls.lv

hits.puls.lv

678 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

19 ms

background_header.jpg

background_header.jpg

342 ms

2670

2670

1129 ms

logo_button.gif

logo_button.gif

148 ms

kurpirkt88.gif

kurpirkt88.gif

464 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

112 ms

pieraksties_lv.gif

pieraksties_lv.gif

114 ms

headermenu_active.gif

headermenu_active.gif

112 ms

cart-icon.png

cart-icon.png

115 ms

eu_fuel.png

eu_fuel.png

107 ms

eu_grip.png

eu_grip.png

214 ms

eu_noise.png

eu_noise.png

219 ms

button_order.png

button_order.png

222 ms

button_left.png

button_left.png

224 ms

button_right.png

button_right.png

228 ms

companyonmap.png

companyonmap.png

867 ms

icon_phone.png

icon_phone.png

327 ms

icon_envelope.png

icon_envelope.png

333 ms

icon_map_pointer.png

icon_map_pointer.png

334 ms

icon_key.png

icon_key.png

341 ms

button_reserv_time.png

button_reserv_time.png

435 ms

icon_workday.png

icon_workday.png

441 ms

icon_weekend.png

icon_weekend.png

443 ms

5546

5546

1035 ms

2699

2699

1139 ms

2822

2822

1141 ms

2726

2726

1170 ms

2740

2740

1133 ms

7546

7546

1210 ms

2724

2724

1281 ms

2826

2826

1306 ms

7542

7542

1315 ms

visa.png

visa.png

425 ms

mc_symbol_opt_45_2x.png

mc_symbol_opt_45_2x.png

435 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

523 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png

ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png

503 ms

ui-icons_888888_256x240.png

ui-icons_888888_256x240.png

502 ms

hits.puls.lv

hits.puls.lv

111 ms

p.gif

p.gif

660 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

57 ms

logo_button.gif

logo_button.gif

31 ms

Accessibility Review

riepa.lv accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

riepa.lv best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

riepa.lv SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LV

  • Language Claimed

    LV

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riepa.lv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latvian/Lettish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riepa.lv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

riepa.lv

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riepa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: