Access rietdekkerbrabant.nl. Rietdekkersbedrijf Tuna rietdekker | Tilburg

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,820 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

405 ms

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

842 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

108 ms

admin_icon.min.css

212 ms

style.min.css

528 ms

Our browser made a total of 133 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (95 requests) were addressed to the original Rietdekkerbrabant.nl, 14% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rietdekkerbrabant.nl.

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Rietdekkerbrabant.nl main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 181.5 kB

Original 214.6 kB
After minification 204.8 kB
After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 10 B

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rietdekker Brabant images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

Original 1.9 MB
After minification 1.9 MB
After compression 787.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.5 MB
After compression 273.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rietdekkerbrabant.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rietdekker Brabant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

NL
Language Claimed

NL
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rietdekkerbrabant.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rietdekkerbrabant.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rietdekker Brabant. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Rietdekkersbedrijf Tuna rietdekker | Tilburg | Rietdekkers Brabant

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

wp-emoji-release.min.js

admin_icon.min.css

style.min.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

rietdekkerbrabant.nl

wp-emoji-release.min.js

admin_icon.min.css

style.min.css

styles.css

rs6.css

dashicons.min.css

wpfront-notification-bar.min.css

css

style.css

prettyPhoto.css

superfish.css

font-awesome.css

audioplayer.css

owl.carousel.css

extend-composer.css

responsive.css

orange.css

js_composer.min.css

Defaults.css

css

ultimate.min.css

rich-reviews.css

css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

wpfront-notification-bar.min.js

jquery.queryloader2.js

custom-loader.js

scripts-top.js

jquery.nav.js

custom-responsive-nav.js

custom-navscroll.js

core.min.js

ultimate.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

rich-reviews.js

font-awesome.css

css

animate.min.css

api.js

js