Tools & Wizards About Us
rigelgroup.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

rigelgroup.in

Rigel

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

663 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

rigelgroup.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rigelgroup.in homepage info - get ready to check Rigel Group best content right away, or after learning these important things about rigelgroup.in

Visit rigelgroup.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rigelgroup.in page load time and found that the first response time was 663 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rigelgroup.in performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.894

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rigelgroup.in

663 ms

bootstrap.min.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

482 ms

animate.css

490 ms

owl.carousel.css

488 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Rigelgroup.in, 19% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rigelgroup.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 129.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rigelgroup.in main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rigel Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 121.6 kB
  • After minification 121.6 kB
  • After compression 118.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 143.9 kB
  • After minification 143.9 kB
  • After compression 137.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rigelgroup.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (65%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rigel Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rigelgroup.in

rigelgroup.in

663 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

290 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

482 ms

animate.css

animate.css

490 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

488 ms

slick.css

slick.css

493 ms

off-canvas.css

off-canvas.css

491 ms

linea-fonts.css

linea-fonts.css

535 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

714 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

737 ms

rsmenu-main.css

rsmenu-main.css

726 ms

rs-spacing.css

rs-spacing.css

750 ms

style.css

style.css

771 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

787 ms

logo-loader.png

logo-loader.png

1183 ms

logo.png

logo.png

971 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1927 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2207 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2467 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

2668 ms

embed

embed

344 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

1212 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1420 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1466 ms

rsmenu-main.js

rsmenu-main.js

1658 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

1706 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1892 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1950 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

2133 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

2171 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

2193 ms

skill.bars.jquery.js

skill.bars.jquery.js

2370 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

2411 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

2440 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

2448 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

2603 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

2656 ms

contact.form.js

contact.form.js

2675 ms

main.js

main.js

2415 ms

js

js

65 ms

abt.jpg

abt.jpg

2962 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

2605 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2417 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

2416 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

43 ms

about-intro-bg.jpg

about-intro-bg.jpg

2337 ms

left-bg.jpg

left-bg.jpg

3109 ms

right-bg.jpg

right-bg.jpg

2558 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

2769 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

2460 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff

21 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff

25 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff

36 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uz.woff

43 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff

42 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uz.woff

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uz.woff

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

3246 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

54 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTQ3iQ.woff

53 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

40 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTQ3iQ.woff

54 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

54 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

55 ms

Accessibility Review

rigelgroup.in accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rigelgroup.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rigelgroup.in SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rigelgroup.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rigelgroup.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rigelgroup.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rigel Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: