4.2 sec in total
996 ms
3.1 sec
173 ms
Click here to check amazing Rihl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rihl.in
hand doctor near me, internal medicine doctor near me, gi doctor near me, pediatric eye doctor near me, geriatric doctors near me, ear doctors near me, vein doctor near me, gastrointestinal doctor nea...
Visit rihl.inWe analyzed Rihl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 996 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
rihl.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
996 ms
181 ms
198 ms
194 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Rihl.in, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Printaugment.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (996 ms) belongs to the original domain Rihl.in.
Page size can be reduced by 281.5 kB (28%)
1.0 MB
736.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rihl.in main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 469.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rihl needs image optimization as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rihl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (90%)
40
4
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rihl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rihl.in
996 ms
style.min.css
181 ms
jquery.selectBox.css
198 ms
font-awesome.css
194 ms
prettyPhoto.css
201 ms
style.css
198 ms
styles.css
375 ms
style.css
242 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
257 ms
woocommerce.css
318 ms
colorbox.css
255 ms
woocommerce.min.css
262 ms
style-main-new.min.css
306 ms
css
33 ms
css
50 ms
jquery.min.js
332 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
275 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
318 ms
js.cookie.min.js
330 ms
woocommerce.min.js
388 ms
invoke.js
56 ms
wc-blocks.css
332 ms
product-query.css
333 ms
rs6.css
393 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
354 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
352 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.min.js
353 ms
index.js
354 ms
index.js
391 ms
script.js
414 ms
rbtools.min.js
467 ms
rs6.min.js
583 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
415 ms
order-attribution.min.js
454 ms
woocompare.min.js
455 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
494 ms
frontend.js
496 ms
frontend.js
518 ms
cropped-cropped-rihlogo-1-1.png
200 ms
parenting.jpeg
331 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
63 ms
rihl.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
rihl.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rihl.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rihl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rihl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rihl.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rihl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: