3 sec in total
194 ms
2.1 sec
705 ms
Click here to check amazing Riitude content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about riitude.com
Welcome to Riitude Management Consulting services which eventually resulted in the formation of Riitude Management consulting private limited.
Visit riitude.comWe analyzed Riitude.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
riitude.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value20.9 s
0/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.632
9/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
194 ms
258 ms
350 ms
135 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Riitude.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) belongs to the original domain Riitude.com.
Page size can be reduced by 328.0 kB (5%)
6.8 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Riitude.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.9 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Riitude images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 226.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.6 kB or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Riitude.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (64%)
56
20
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Riitude. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
riitude.com
194 ms
riitude.com
258 ms
www.riitude.com
350 ms
bootstrap.min.css
135 ms
animate.css
198 ms
owl.carousel.css
206 ms
font-awesome.css
223 ms
themify-icons.css
214 ms
flaticon.css
216 ms
layers.css
282 ms
settings.css
270 ms
prettyPhoto.css
280 ms
shortcodes.css
289 ms
main.css
359 ms
responsive.css
296 ms
js
66 ms
jquery.min.js
514 ms
tether.min.js
371 ms
bootstrap.min.js
371 ms
jquery.easing.js
371 ms
jquery-waypoints.js
370 ms
jquery-validate.js
514 ms
owl.carousel.js
516 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
516 ms
numinate.min6959.js
514 ms
main.js
514 ms
chart.js
684 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
602 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
598 ms
slider.js
598 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
597 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
597 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
675 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
676 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
675 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
676 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
736 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
736 ms
css
34 ms
js
179 ms
analytics.js
171 ms
pre-loader-1.gif
289 ms
logo.jpg
303 ms
slider-mainbg-001.jpg
598 ms
slider-mainbg-002.jpg
602 ms
slider-mainbg-003.jpg
536 ms
slider-mainbg-004.jpg
654 ms
slider-mainbg-005.jpg
537 ms
single-img-one.jpg
543 ms
row-bgimage-1.jpg
665 ms
single-img-two.jpg
669 ms
row-bgimage-2.jpg
729 ms
client-01.png
671 ms
client-02.png
676 ms
client-03.png
742 ms
footer-bg.jpg
743 ms
footer-bg-one.jpg
743 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
147 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
149 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
149 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
150 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
147 ms
fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff
613 ms
Flaticon.svg
628 ms
Flaticon.woff
650 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf
150 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf
151 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf
150 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf
151 ms
pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf
152 ms
themify9f24.woff
668 ms
collect
89 ms
revicons90c690c6.woff
439 ms
riitude.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
riitude.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
riitude.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Riitude.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Riitude.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
riitude.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Riitude. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: