2.7 sec in total
447 ms
1.8 sec
462 ms
Visit rijha.org now to see the best up-to-date Rijha content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rijha.org
Welcome to the RIJHA Website! Like us on Facebook!
Visit rijha.orgWe analyzed Rijha.org page load time and found that the first response time was 447 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rijha.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value6.2 s
44/100
10%
Value2,810 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.255
48/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
447 ms
68 ms
49 ms
258 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rijha.org, 11% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Rijha.org.
Page size can be reduced by 74.7 kB (2%)
3.1 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rijha.org main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rijha images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rijha.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)
51
15
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rijha. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rijha.org
447 ms
css.css
68 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
scripts_v2.js
258 ms
css
62 ms
js
92 ms
front.css
182 ms
style.min.css
188 ms
style.css
185 ms
styles.css
184 ms
ytprefs.min.css
186 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
245 ms
jquery.min.js
273 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
272 ms
redirect_method.js
272 ms
57 ms
ytprefs.min.js
272 ms
front.js
317 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
319 ms
comment-reply.min.js
318 ms
index.js
345 ms
index.js
344 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
440 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
440 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
439 ms
index.js
440 ms
api.js
104 ms
index.js
438 ms
fitvids.min.js
518 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
518 ms
mailcheck.min.js
518 ms
punycode.min.js
518 ms
utils.min.js
519 ms
wpforms.min.js
519 ms
RIJHA-Logo-2019-bandw-164sq.png
285 ms
cse.js
195 ms
parchment-2-798x1075.jpg
354 ms
Typewriter-News-415x324.jpg
336 ms
Digital-Archive-415x324.jpg
379 ms
research-services-415x324.jpg
378 ms
Fall-Meeting-2024-Jews-that-built-RI-social-media-2-300x232.jpg
259 ms
emanuel.jpg
337 ms
notes-1-scaled.jpg
684 ms
D-6-front-Willard-Ave-circa-1947-e1574701456288.jpg
563 ms
face.png
389 ms
insta.jpg
416 ms
submit-spin.svg
440 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
26 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
55 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
81 ms
recaptcha__en.js
67 ms
cse_element__en.js
54 ms
default+en.css
84 ms
default.css
82 ms
async-ads.js
35 ms
branding.png
13 ms
clear.png
13 ms
rijha.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rijha.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
rijha.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rijha.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rijha.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rijha.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rijha. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: