Tools & Wizards About Us
rilaexpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

rilaexpress.com

Public transport| Bus from Blagoevgrad to Rila Monastery and back.

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

902 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

rilaexpress.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rila Express content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rilaexpress.com

Public transport from Blagoevgrad To Rila Monastery.

Visit rilaexpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rilaexpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 902 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rilaexpress.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.192

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rilaexpress.com

902 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

194 ms

gtranslate-style16.css

308 ms

style.min.css

450 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

453 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Rilaexpress.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) belongs to the original domain Rilaexpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rilaexpress.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 38.6 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rila Express images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 198.5 kB

  • Original 285.5 kB
  • After minification 263.6 kB
  • After compression 87.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 99.3 kB

  • Original 133.8 kB
  • After minification 117.7 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rilaexpress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rila Express. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rilaexpress.com

www.rilaexpress.com

902 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

194 ms

gtranslate-style16.css

gtranslate-style16.css

308 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

450 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

453 ms

public.css

public.css

343 ms

styles.css

styles.css

345 ms

style.css

style.css

575 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

421 ms

css

css

30 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

682 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

459 ms

spacious-custom.js

spacious-custom.js

534 ms

kkcountdown.js

kkcountdown.js

561 ms

jquery.blockUI.js

jquery.blockUI.js

565 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

571 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

647 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

672 ms

tooltip.min.js

tooltip.min.js

677 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

700 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

701 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

683 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

706 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

713 ms

public.js

public.js

718 ms

element.js

element.js

40 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

733 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

732 ms

spacious-slider-setting.js

spacious-slider-setting.js

795 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

815 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

823 ms

logo-.png

logo-.png

115 ms

bg.png

bg.png

115 ms

en.png

en.png

119 ms

ru.png

ru.png

188 ms

es.png

es.png

208 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

887 ms

slide21.jpg

slide21.jpg

791 ms

slide-4.jpg

slide-4.jpg

569 ms

clock-11.png

clock-11.png

234 ms

camera-11.png

camera-11.png

302 ms

compose-11.png

compose-11.png

319 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

40 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

421 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

0 ms

Accessibility Review

rilaexpress.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rilaexpress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rilaexpress.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rilaexpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rilaexpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rilaexpress.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rila Express. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: