8.9 sec in total
1.8 sec
6.9 sec
279 ms
Welcome to rilub.it homepage info - get ready to check Rilub best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about rilub.it
Visit rilub.itWe analyzed Rilub.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rilub.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value27.7 s
0/100
10%
Value16,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
1765 ms
110 ms
222 ms
313 ms
315 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Rilub.it, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rilub.it.
Page size can be reduced by 232.0 kB (6%)
3.8 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Rilub.it main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rilub images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rilub.it has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (70%)
63
19
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rilub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rilub.it
1765 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
110 ms
style.min.css
222 ms
styles.css
313 ms
style.min.css
315 ms
pix-icons.css
332 ms
bootstrap.min.css
340 ms
main.css
573 ms
plugins.css
359 ms
custom.css
413 ms
child-theme-style.css
415 ms
animate.min.css
436 ms
bbpress.css
433 ms
responsive.css
445 ms
css
57 ms
js_composer.min.css
835 ms
Defaults.css
494 ms
style.min.css
508 ms
headings.min.css
531 ms
mpc-styles.css
748 ms
jquery.min.js
1091 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
744 ms
language-cookie.js
744 ms
script.min.js
745 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1221 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1629 ms
headings.min.js
1631 ms
css
34 ms
background-style.min.css
1751 ms
css
34 ms
rs6.css
1750 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1752 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1785 ms
index.js
1793 ms
rbtools.min.js
1790 ms
rs6.min.js
1818 ms
waypoints.min.js
1790 ms
plugins.js
1794 ms
scripts.js
1791 ms
like-me.js
1790 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
1736 ms
mpc-vendor.min.js
1619 ms
mpc-scripts.min.js
1536 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1552 ms
jquery-appear.min.js
1530 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
1523 ms
custom.min.js
1498 ms
ig1.svg
294 ms
linkedin.svg
315 ms
CART.svg
290 ms
logo-rilub-1.png
315 ms
dummy.png
311 ms
eurolube1.png
313 ms
wynns1.png
359 ms
ravenol.png
310 ms
AZ3.png
306 ms
private_label_image-252x500.png
351 ms
logo-Rilub-tinte-piatte-Copy.png
305 ms
ClashGrotesk-Regular.woff
731 ms
ClashDisplay-Medium.woff
486 ms
pix-fonts.woff
792 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
730 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
709 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
708 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
700 ms
lubrificanti1.png
1284 ms
hero_ricambi-1.png
1210 ms
addittivi.png
1102 ms
chi-siamo.png
1175 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
56 ms
hero_ricambi-1.png
808 ms
addittivi.png
492 ms
rilub.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rilub.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rilub.it SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rilub.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rilub.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rilub.it
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rilub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: