Tools & Wizards About Us
rilub.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rilub.it

Rilub – Produttore di lubrificanti e distributore di ricambi

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

782 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

273 ms

rilub.it screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rilub.it homepage info - get ready to check Rilub best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about rilub.it

Visit rilub.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Rilub.it page load time and found that the first response time was 782 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rilub.it performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rilub.it

782 ms

style.min.css

244 ms

styles.css

357 ms

style.min.css

358 ms

pix-icons.css

350 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Rilub.it, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rilub.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 227.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rilub.it main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 76.9 kB

  • Original 93.7 kB
  • After minification 92.9 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 133.0 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rilub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 340.5 kB
  • After minification 340.5 kB
  • After compression 337.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 207.4 kB
  • After minification 207.3 kB
  • After compression 192.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rilub.it has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (69%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rilub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rilub.it

rilub.it

782 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

244 ms

styles.css

styles.css

357 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

358 ms

pix-icons.css

pix-icons.css

350 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

358 ms

main.css

main.css

616 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

361 ms

custom.css

custom.css

467 ms

child-theme-style.css

child-theme-style.css

468 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

475 ms

bbpress.css

bbpress.css

482 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

480 ms

css

css

40 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

715 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

597 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

600 ms

headings.min.css

headings.min.css

599 ms

mpc-styles.css

mpc-styles.css

734 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

836 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

732 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

733 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

751 ms

modernizr.custom.min.js

modernizr.custom.min.js

830 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

921 ms

headings.min.js

headings.min.js

922 ms

css

css

19 ms

background-style.min.css

background-style.min.css

826 ms

css

css

25 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

826 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

882 ms

index.js

index.js

883 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1010 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1218 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

884 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

884 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

974 ms

like-me.js

like-me.js

1009 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

1012 ms

mpc-vendor.min.js

mpc-vendor.min.js

1012 ms

mpc-scripts.min.js

mpc-scripts.min.js

969 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

933 ms

jquery-appear.min.js

jquery-appear.min.js

931 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

934 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

931 ms

ig1.svg

ig1.svg

392 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

406 ms

CART.svg

CART.svg

404 ms

logo-rilub-1.png

logo-rilub-1.png

411 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

410 ms

eurolube1.png

eurolube1.png

487 ms

wynns1.png

wynns1.png

513 ms

ravenol.png

ravenol.png

518 ms

AZ3.png

AZ3.png

518 ms

private_label_image-252x500.png

private_label_image-252x500.png

524 ms

logo-Rilub-tinte-piatte-Copy.png

logo-Rilub-tinte-piatte-Copy.png

530 ms

lubrificanti1.png

lubrificanti1.png

902 ms

hero_ricambi-1.png

hero_ricambi-1.png

815 ms

addittivi.png

addittivi.png

928 ms

chi-siamo.png

chi-siamo.png

1064 ms

ClashGrotesk-Regular.woff

ClashGrotesk-Regular.woff

556 ms

ClashDisplay-Medium.woff

ClashDisplay-Medium.woff

569 ms

pix-fonts.woff

pix-fonts.woff

793 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

65 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

98 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

99 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

35 ms

hero_ricambi-1.png

hero_ricambi-1.png

737 ms

addittivi.png

addittivi.png

488 ms

Accessibility Review

rilub.it accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rilub.it best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rilub.it SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rilub.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rilub.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rilub.it

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rilub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: